And have we come full circle to god damn horse armor.

  • Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s crazy how far micro-transactions and monetizing games have come since Bethesda charged $2.50 for cosmetic armor to put on your horse. If you’d told someone back then that one day an in-game mount would cost more than the game itself they would have laughed you out of the room.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      124
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m so sick of this revisionist bs. Plenty of us were outraged then and warned of EXACTLY this. Y’all reaped what you sowed. Now micro transactions and paid early access are the norm. We screamed and yelled to “vote with your wallets”, and by god, you did. “It’s just a few bucks” is the most common one I hear. Well, now EVERYTHING is “just a few bucks”.

      You won.

      • rustyfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This. That’s why I gave up on arguing with people a long time ago. There is a shimmer of hope in me that this industry still comes crashing down at some point. I would celebrate it. But by the looks of it, it won’t happen anytime soon.

        The best I could do is not buying anything on release, early access or riddled with microtransactions, mostly indie games and maybe one AAA title a year, also avoid certain studios. Oh, and also don’t really care at all when these kind of news come up. I cared back then, I voted with my wallet and still do, but the other side won. Shit happens. There is nothing I can do other than get angry, but that’s not worth the hassle.

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          A crash is impossible at this point, the market is too big and vast, if AAA dies, mobile will live on like nothing happened, and guess where lootboxes and gacha started…

        • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m with you. I buy almost exclusively on-sale games. I try to buy the super-premium editions about a year after release so I can get lots of content for less than the original game costs, and I avoid any p2w or lootbox games altogether.

          Do I miss interactions with some friends who only play the latest titles? Absolutely. I have primarily been a single player gamer anyway, so maybe it just doesn’t impact me as terribly.

      • funktion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The market has spoken, and it said some real stupid shit. I’ve given up on gaming as a hobby, and good riddance.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          If we trusted the Market to make it good for us, we’d still have children working 16 hour shifts until they get their arms chewed off by machinery and get thrown on the streets to starve.

          “Vote with your wallet” is just something business say to try to convince us that regulation isn’t needed, conveniently forgetting to mention that the fattest wallet in the room is the CEO’s.

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also let’s not forget the horse armor was the free patch, Microsoft allowed 1 free cosmetic patch on the x-box, then everything else they required Bethesda to put a price on. It just so happened to be win -win for both Bethesda and Microsoft

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah I remember saying that that Bethesda’s horse armor bs would lead to gamers being nickeled and dimed to death and was soundly called a overreacting whinger.

      And like you said here we are now and gamers are being outright exploited and you still have people saying it’s all still blown out of proportion like these companies aren’t hiring psychologists to manipulate us to buy this bullshit.

    • Tarcion@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Some people would have laughed you out of the room. A lot of people, myself included, warned that this was the kind of shit we’d spiral into with these microtransactions. It was basically confirmed within a year or two with the absolutely insane amount of money mobile gaming was seeing where the base product was just addictive crap with as many microtransactions shoveled in as possible. These games just completely blew the revenue of actual AAA titles would out of the water. It was basically inevitable and we’re now in a situation where we’ve got a generation of consumers raised on this trash.

    • Mereo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s a slippery slope. Money talks. They are accountable to their shareholders. So when they saw that people were paying for them, they started to monetise more and more.

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Horse Armor? How about a jewel-encrusted horse!?

      Am I alone in thinking this is a joke that has gone over everyone’s heads? Isn’t it just a sparkly topping on a pile of currency anyway?

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Every time this comes up (which is too often) I’m like “Who is buying this?” How can we make them stop? Do they need help?

    • ericbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes.

      People who spend 10s of thousands of dollars on micro transactions do need help.

      Said help probably needs to come at a government level banning things that were designed in a computer lab to be digital Crack.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s such a shame that the OW1 discussion about loot boxes went nowhere in regards to giving ingame gambling the same legal framework as IRL gambling.

        • Rubanski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Also kind of crazy that loot boxes were far less predatory than the current ow2 system is. It was very possible to never buy boxes and get everything. Nowadays? No chance

          • Contend6248@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I mean, they also freed me from my pain wanting to play that game, only with their shitty update, so i have to thank Blizzard.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well, I’m of two minds about that.

            To a healthy person, the current system is pricier and more aggressive. Things are constantly being shoved in your face, but they’re all purchase-only, and 20€/skin is just absurd.

            But, I disagree that it’s more predatory. To a vulnerable person, the new system doesn’t elicit an addictive response, which loot boxes due to their gambling nature do.

            • Rubanski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think FOMO is quite a strong motivator for a addictive person. At least loot boxes were obtainable via playing the game. I wouldn’t say I am an excessive gamer, but I still managed to basically get everything over the span of 6 years playing the game. But now you HAVE to spend money to relieve FOMO pressure. Forcing you to spend money is quite predatory.

              • GhostMatter@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I agree with this. Overwatch 2 is FOMO galore. It stressed me out.

                With Overwatch 1, most content came back later, with exceptions for the charity skin and a few small things.

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It was possible to get everything but lets not overlook the inherently manipulative framing of either paying or making the game a second job, which cultivates a sunk cost mindset, which might once again make the player pay out of FOMO.

            There are reasonable amounts of grind that can make games fun for some people, but the length of grind and the limited timeframes for obtaining items are all geared to feed into the same monetization cycle. All of that artificially, because it’s not like any digital game has to clear their storeroom and shelves to make space for new collectibles.

            Game companies have been very sly about how they use physical real world metaphors to create justifications for their manipulative systems. Lootboxes too, because you can’t guess what’s in a closed pack… except the game keeps perfect track of what is available, what you have and what you don’t have. The only reason why anyone would get repeated lootbox items, is to lead them on and get them to waste money.

        • Caveman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Anything that costs money to use with a randomised result should be considered gambling.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes, it’s high time we shut down the kinder surprise gambling dens.

            • Caveman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I mean, yeah. Showing what Kinder toy is inside is a small price to pay for a broad stroke gambling law.

              • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                It’s going to take all kids products with the idea as kinder surprise. All campaigns where you might win something for buying a product you’re going to buy anyway. All trading card games. I think there’s even an argument to be made that it would make looters, battle royales, even Minecraft as gambling because the end result of your gaming experience is random. Broadstroking all random away simply doesn’t work.

                • Caveman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Not all random events. Just anything that requires payment to activate a randomised event / prize should be forbidden for children.

    • bcron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Might be the people that play only one game. I used to play WoW and then Diablo III exclusively like it was a full time job, and wound up in social bubbles with people who were equally invested. I never spent money on cosmetics or in-game items or anything but at that point it’d be pretty easy to rationalize since it’s something someone is spending 20-80 hours a week playing.

      Back in WoW we used to sell one slot on our Algalon raid (hardmode only raid boss) and pay for our Ventrilo and website with that lol

      • excitingburp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Grubby is a good example of someone who was recently reformed. In one of his early Dota 2 videos (some time last year), he admitted that he didn’t know that games outside of Blizzard had gotten so good - he actually only played Blizzard games and nothing else. It’s been pretty wholesome watching someone learn the wider gaming world.

        • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I find it bizarre that someone would ever pigeonhole themselves into one developer. I don’t even know who makes games half the time. There’s only one that I have blocked on Steam.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      10 months ago

      The fact that this meme misattributes horse armor to Skyrim instead of Oblivion is bothering me way more than it should

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I seriously doubt it, but I really hope they keep their word about no more ship sales after the official 1.0 release…

      I can get behind the idea of “you want to support the game at high dollar amounts since you have that kind of cash, go for it.” But I can’t get behind “well people keep buying ships so let’s just keep selling super fucking expensive ships after we’re already “done” with the game.”

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        As if they’ll keep their word about anything, the game’s only 8 years past their initial launch debut.

        “But but but S42 is done and now they’re making the PU more quickly!”

        Yep, and I’m sure they’ll reach their 100 star system goal (lol) in about 40 years. Orrrr they’ll just release 5-10 solar systems and then shrug when people ask why they stopped.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    If youre still playing D4, I dont know what to tell you. Most people who pay attention to industry news and the game design philosophy of Blizzard knew well enough to pass it over.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I saw someone mentioned the other day in that thread about buyer’s remorse that they didn’t even feel like they were playing a game, that it played itself basically and that just made me think about watching my son-in-law playing Diablo 3 and all he really did was walk around while shit died around him due to his character’s abilities and items, and I asked how that was even fun anymore and he turned to me with a straight face and said “it’s not fun. I just want to 100% it.”

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      i only played it because it came free with my xbox. then starfield came out and i completely forgot about d4

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I was hoping in vain that Blizzard might pivot even a little when they saw the backlash but nah people continue to throw money away on bullshit so of course Blizzard wouldn’t

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Now I feel all the more right for skipping over it. To be honest, I didn’t mind Diablo 3 once it had all its content and was no longer a dual-wield credit card simulator. It was a pretty fun game by the end IMO. Diablo 4 didn’t feel right to me so I just skipped it.

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        D4 really isn’t that different from current D3. In some areas it’s actually better. But of course both of those suck compared to D2 or PoE.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or just stop playing games that exist as shitty GACHA vending machines.

      It isn’t even the cost per-say. Its the fact that mounts were implemented in D4 as a practical afterthought. They barely affect gameplay, you can’t take them into dungeons, they don’t have any kind of skill progression or character synergy on their own right. Barely more than a TF2 fancy hat.

      I got D4 at base price on release, played the main act, and shelved it months ago. I can’t imagine still playing a game that’s been nothing but bloody runs since that initial release. Nevermind paying $60 for a fucking cosmetics improvement while I grind mobs for incremental stat increases at the level cap.

      • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        TF2 fancy hats are relevant to the game. They provide an entire economy and allow for style, when finding ever new or enjoying old ways of hilarious frags.

        They are not an after thought, but a solid part of the games progressed development. However they are not providing an advantage in the core play, so everyone can still enjoy the game.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      At least Diablo is easier to quit than games that literally condition players into a gambling addiction. But all this is easier said than done.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean Diablo is pretty addicting too lol, one of my friends dropped out of school for Diablo. Then again, one of my friends almost dropped out of school for Modern Warfare 2 - not that it wasn’t fun of course (most fun CoD imo).

  • formergijoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Meanwhile, Helldivers 2’s armor is like 2 bucks, and you can find the currency in-game.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its nice to see a low cost microtransaction, and nice to see that you can get the currency in game but really thats just the same as it was a few years back before it went full 100 dollar for a reskin mode.

      You are defending a game by pointing out that its money grabbing methods are less greedy than another company.

      Games wont make the billions and billions they make now if they move away from the in game purchases models but they also evidently dont need billions and billions to operate.

      Some of the best games on the market were made on small budgets by indie developers and sell well because the are fun and people actually want to play them.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would argue that on online game kinda needs a stream of revenue that’s doesn’t only come from the first purchase, since that will stagnate.

        • Alenalda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Maybe we don’t make every game a live service. Remember halo 2, game was fantastic and no micro transactions in sight if you don’t count xbl.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    What happened to the micro part of microtransactions? This is why I only bought one skin in Genshin Impact since they give you extra funny money for your first time to get it, but a second skin will double than the first so I’m never buying one ever again.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Dumb fucks kept giving shitty publishers like Activision and Ubisoft money for microtransactions, so those companies did what any good capitalist would do: see how much you can fleece the idiots.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I saw a post a couple years back in the Red Dead subreddit where someone posted a screenshot of their character. They had something like thousands of gold bars, and when someone asked how he had so many, the OP actually said that they spend $100 a month on the gold packs. Each month.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      At least Genshin Impact had a fucking plot, too. I can stomach dropping an extra $30 on a game after the first 100 hours. But D4 just stopped being a story after release. I was having fun exploring the world and plot in Genshin for the better part of two years (thanks, COVID!) I cleared D4 in a month. Cleared it again with another class. Got bored and shelved it.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Genshin is good in some aspects, but it shows how desensitized we are that we accept the egregious gambling and the endless grind that only exists for the sake of retention. Can Genshin players really talk shit about this when in average it takes around $200 to get one single 5* character? Even if you are not paying that yourself, the game is built that way to exploit those who do.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          we accept the egregious gambling and the endless grind that only exists for the sake of retention

          The world was big enough and rich enough that I could mostly ignore the dungeons and never really feel like grinding. I just kinda wandered around chasing quest-lines and having fun. I didn’t sweat the 5* heroes and never really had a problem with the PvE aspect of the game. Admittedly, I wasn’t doing end-game content or playing anything remotely competitively.

          Even if you are not paying that yourself, the game is built that way to exploit those who do.

          Sure. Its a game full of psychological landmines. And if you’re in your 30s and you’ve learned how to dance through the bullshit, then its easy. But if you’re playing this game as a twelve year old and constantly getting spammed by the Wallet Inspector to give up another $20, less so.

          But… I can’t do anything about that. What really gets me is that the country where this game is produced (China) has better and more comprehensive regulations to limit exploitation of end-users than the countries where the majority of players come from (Japan, Korea, USA). I believe there was even some amount of controversy in how hard the western-oriented interfaces sold in-game purchases, relative to the domestic versions.

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            You can avoid the grind at first since the game is PvE, but the further you go the more the game demands you to increase the World Level, and the more grind you need to do to get each character playable at that level.

            I didn’t max out my World Level because at some point it felt like undoing my work of powering up the characters, but the game definitely pushes you that way. Not only story quests, but doiing Abyss levels for more free currency requires high level characters.

            That’s not even mentioning Artifacts which have so many layers of randomized stats that you could be basically grinding forever to get one which has exactly the stats you want.

            I can never shake off the feeling that if Genshin wasn’t gacha, if you could get characters from quests and weapons and artifacts from exploration, it would be a much, much better game, even if it was smaller and shorter. But more and more, this seems to be the kind of game that companies want to make.

            China seems to be showing a bit more pulse than many countries as far as reining in lootbox games goes, but it’s still not enough, and it doesn’t seem the benefits of these efforts can be seen worldwide.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I mean, enough would be loading these senior executives and marketing directors into a cannon and firing them into the ocean. But I agree, even the most stringent rules always seem to be attacking the edges of the problem.

    • Killer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I buy the monthly cards in advance and use the gems they give you from that, best value way of getting them

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      10 months ago

      Step 1: make some genuinely top shelf, genre-defining games in the 90s and early 2000s

      Step 2: Sell out

      Step 3: Become shittier than anyone could ever imagine

      Step 4: Charge 1 kidney for a shitty in app purchase

  • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t people warned about this before the game even came out?

    This should fall under the purview of “fools and their money.”

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Such that laws are created to protect people from scammers? Because that is what really should be done. With the rise of this "buying is not owning’ bulshit, it has been a long time coming.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    i got plenty of hate when i said years ago this is where the mtx slippery slope would get us

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I did that for a while, but I discovered my local library has a great selection of games. I went from spending a few hundo on games a year to buying two a year - Christmas and birthday, and doing the rest of my gaming exploring their catalogue. It’s been great on my wallet. Hooray libraries.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Holy information density batman! That’s a fucking mess to look at there’s so much going on it stopped being cool looking

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hahahaha! I hadn’t seen it before! And people are expected to (and some do) spend money on that?

  • caut_R@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This year‘s CK3 DLC package is also very close in price to the „base game.“ Naturally, it provides nowhere near as much content and I refuse to believe it requires nearly as much work to make either.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Paradox DLC policy is why I don’t play Paradox games anymore.

      If I were to only play 1 game ever, then the DLC system might be ok, it’s basically a subscription system. But since I’d only play a campaign every other year or so, I’m not going to fork out that much money for 1 campaign. And it’s way too annoying to play some game with obvious parts missing + in game ads, so now Paradox gets no more money from me.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I feel Paradox DLCs are the better way of DLCs. They add good content but you absolutely can enjoy the game without them

      • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah I loved EUIV early on, but have left it alone for a while. Now, whenever I get the urge to play again (and I do), I have a look at everything that popped up in the meantime and it’s just overwhelming. Sure, I could play the snapshot I have but then the game keeps getting patched so you get stunted new mechanics that need the DLCs to function properly. I could revert to a previous patch, but what was the patch in march 2021? Do I still find it in the steam options?

        And if you want to bite the bullet and just buy the whole DLC collection it’s around 100 euro for a couple of years. or something like 300 for the whole package? I do appreciate the quality that paradox churns out though.

        This is why I’ve been holding off on getting victoria 3.

      • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can you expand on this in-game ad thing? I love paradox but it’s been loooong time since I played one of theirs.

        • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Here’s an complaint thread (not mine) with a screenshot: https://old.reddit.com/r/hoi4/comments/suurzs/paradox_this_is_unacceptable_in_a_paid_product/

          I personally get more annoyed by in game presentation of features and then getting hit with a “you need to pay extra to use this”, that’s basically an ad as well and it’s constantly there in the main gameplay loop. Bye bye immersion. It’s an annoyance every time that you are confronted with it, which in most paradox games is basically all the time. It’s like buying a car and then having to pay extra to unlock the seat heating that is already installed.

          I could probably work around it by not auto updating paradox games and installing mods to remove some of the ads, but for 1 campaign every 2 years that’s just not worth the hassle for me. So I simply don’t play paradox games anymore.

        • RandomGuy613@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          English is not my first language. So basically how it works is you buy the base game and then you can download mods on workshop. Then you download the cracked version (preferably with the latest patch.) Then you launch the game through steam and select the modlist you wanna play, then you launch the cracked version and it will have that same modlist. I tried it with CK3, HOI4 and Stellaris but i bet it’s the same with all of their games. Only thing that sucks is you can’t easily download the latest patch for cracked version, but you can stop steam updates while you finish one playthrough or something. Hope this helps if you need better explanation dm me

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Kind of like Monster Hunter Rise’s DLC being almost the same price as the game, while having no campaign at all, unlike Iceborne.