• Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      169
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      pi ends with the digit 9, followed by an infinite sequence of other digits.

      That’s a very interesting use of the word “ends”.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        TBF, if your goal is to generate the most valid sentence that directly answers the question, it’s only one minor abstract noun that’s broken here.

        Edit: I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a substantial drop in the probability of a digit being listed after the leading 9 (3.14159…), even, so it is “last” in a sense.

        Edit again: Man, Baader-Meinhof so hard. Somehow pi to 5 digits came up more than once in 24 hours, so yes.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe it knows something about pi we don’t.

        It’s infinite yet ends in a 9. It’s a great mystery.

          • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            I saw someone post this a few days ago, and someone else quickly pointed out that it is incorrect. This time I’ll point out it is incorrect.

            In base-pi, pi would be represented as 10. The place value of the right-most digit would be pi^0, and the next digit is pi^1.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s pretty much what radians are. Well, they combine base pi with whatever base you’re using for the coefficients.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Hyperreal numbers go brrr.

          I’m kind of curious what ways exactly using this in place of actual pi would change/break geometry. Obviously, it wouldn’t become noticeable until you try to involve infinite structures.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            There’s probably some finetuning at play for Amazon’s thing which makes it tend to always give a straight answer, instead of stepping outside of the box and doing something like correcting an implicit assumption.