Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn’t sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    It is interesting to me that the people who are PASSIONATELY concerned about the plight of poor people in the third world, spend so much time pushing the solution of not voting for Kamala Harris, and so little time pushing support for charity work, NGOs in the United States, supporting the rare tiny handful of politicians who actually do care about human rights, or similar things. I think the amount of content I saw from them before the election that was dealing exclusively with the importance of not supporting Democrats probably outnumbered the other stuff by about 10:1. I guess as long as we make enough Kamala Harris memes, the Palestinians will be saved. Who knew?

    Well, it worked out in the last election, I can’t wait for everything to get better for everyone in Gaza. That’s definitely what’s going to happen now, right?

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’ve run into you a few times. Let me save us both some time with the bullshit lesser of two evils finger wagging, neolib.

      Kamala in no way, shape, or form supported any kind of peace in Palestine. So I have no idea what you’re pretending about.