There’s no magazine on any instance that I see of such a community on the topic matter. To anyone not familiar, a patient gamer is someone who is immune to FOMO, doesn’t get caught up or tied up with current modern gaming. Someone who doesn’t care that they’ve beaten a game from 1996 and here it is 2024. Someone who doesn’t care that they’re still playing games 40, 20 or even 5 years ago on the present day.

I would personally say that I am. I don’t have a level of disposable income where I’m throwing down on buying games. I’ve spent 10 years between 2011 and 2021 wheeling and dealing on game sales. So much that I’ve piled on over 1,000+ games combined between GOG, Steam, Battle.net and Epic Games.

I do more often than not, play games from so long ago than I do modern games. I’m at a stage in my life where I am noticeably slowing down on gaming in general, I am also finding myself more comforted in what I play and I again can’t simply just keep buying newer games. I also don’t really care about buying newer games, the time of the present is rich with game sales all day, everyday.

There will always be a time later to buy a game that is ripened for a good sale. So I don’t have to worry at all.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t buy a game solely because it’s the zeitgeist or whatever. A friend of mine routinely buys games that are “the new shiny” and then doesn’t finish them, or loses interest quickly. I usually wait for a sale, some patches, and/or the dlc to be bundled into a goty edition.

    Some exceptions:

    I bought elden ring near launch because I’m a big enjoyer of the genre, and my friend confirmed it was good. No regrets.

    I bought bg3 shortly before it’s full access. I’d liked the other games larian did, and a friend told me it was good. No regrets.

    Both of those were pretty light on DLC. No season pass or “goty” editions were likely.

    I’m going to wait for the dragon age game to go on sale. I don’t really trust Bioware, and I don’t know if they plan to do a bunch of dlc that will get bundled up later.

    I’ve been waiting for Lies of P to get cheap. The demo was just ok when I played it, but a friend tells me it’s phenomenal.

    Right now I’m playing a MUD (aardwolf). It really distills some online RPG into the essence of “go kill some stuff to level up, get new skills, and kill bigger stuff”. It’s strangely satisfying.

  • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Huge steam library, RTX 3060, currently playing either 7D2D, or vanilla WOW over on Warmane (excited for the upcoming move to TBC which is around 17 years old or so).

  • blarth@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I am just so underwhelmed by most games these days that I’ve stopped buying them. I didn’t play BG3 until someone bought it for me as a gift, and then I really enjoyed the shit out of it. It probably made it even more fun that I didn’t plan to play it and had very low expectations. So I guess that’s part of the fun for me now - waiting for a sale or free game and hoping that it’s better than I imagine it to be.

  • liminis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It feels like a natural consequence of playing a lot of indie games; there’s too many little gems you just don’t hear much about on release, or which you end up only learning about because they end up bundled with something else you were being patient about.

    Though I’m not even sure how I’d apply this label to traditional roguelikes, given how many are free, and how many more seem to be in a permanent state of development/‘early access’ (Caves of Qud is hitting 1.0 in a month does break my go-to example there though).

    There’s definitely an appeal with some of the better AA and ‘AAA’ games too beyond financial reasons though, given the tendency for bigger studios to launch titles full of bugs these days. (I loved Cyberpunk when I played it a couple of months after release – was lucky to not experience many bugs at all on PC – but it’s so much easier to widely recommend it since it hit 2.0.

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Yes and no. It depends on the games. Usually I wait for discounts now though. I don’t have time to play every game anyways so it saves me money to wait. Even during sales, I’ll stop and ask myself if I’ll play it soon. If I don’t think I will, I usually just wait

  • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    While I admire the ideas behind patient gamers and think it probably works out really well for some people, I personally also enjoy participating in the zeitgeist from time to time. Playing Elden Ring on launch was fantastic - you really felt like you were exploring the world alongside everyone else as you’re finding Ashes and weapons that don’t even have wiki entries yet.

    • ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The thing is you don’t actually have to look at wiki entries or any media surrounding game hype really. I have virtually no spoilers on Elden ring and I still haven’t played it.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah but it’s not really the same thing years later when most people are long finished with the game. Was the same with playing BG3 around release last year, participating in conversations with friends and strangers alike about discoveries in the game as it’s happening and everyone is talking about it and playing it at the same time. I’m sure similar things happened this year with Black Myth Wukong and Silent Hill 2 Remake to some extent, though I didn’t play those.

        It’s not about spoilers so much as participating in the buzz and culture and community that only really occurs around release.

        • Skelemental@mastodon.gamedev.place
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          @Coelacanth @ndondo yeah the games are lower priced later because their value actually does decrease. I find myself simply never playing or purchasing games that I was going to wait for a price drop on. It’s kind of like watching a championship game from years ago. Even if you personally don’t know the outcome something is lost from not being in the right moment for it. This varies more with games but I think people undersell it.

          • ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I see your perspective. I think the difference with me is that I don’t value the cultural moment very much and more so care if the game is good aside from hype. The main exception being multiplayer games. Those mostly are active when they’re new.

  • Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    yes, for the most part. unless im REALLY interested in a game, i generally wait till i find it on 50%+ sale. the last game i bought on full price was hi-fi rush, and the last one before that would have been dmc5, if the rx580 i bought at the time didnt already have a code included

  • Zetta@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only video game I play is Team Fortress 2, anywhere from 10 to 20 hours a week. So I guess I’m a patient gamer since my favorite game is over 6,000 days old.

  • domdanial@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just bought the F.E.A.R bundle from steam a week ago or so, and beat the first game in the series 20 years after release. And other than a fan made .dll patch, it was great. Lacked some depth more modern titles have, but I also noticed how much effort was put into some details that were surprising for its age.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s easy to be patient when you have a backlog of games to go through. Paying full price for a game that still has Denuvo or other forms of DRM just isn’t worth it for me. That said, I’m very sad Fantasian will be released with Denuvo soon after years of languishing in Apple Arcade.

  • Ethereal87@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it’s fair to say I’m more patient than I was. Having kids has slowed me down on playing games constantly, but I’ve also drifted towards more indie games and away from big tentpole $60-$70 releases. Some games will be a day one purchase based on enjoying their past work(s), like Tactical Breach Wizards and Steamworld Heist 2, and the cost barrier ends up lower. The last time I went for the big AAA game on or close to launch was Hogwarts Legacy, and that was mostly for the wife since she loves all things Harry Potter.

    With the sheer amount of games being released and being able to find just about anything you could want, there’s not really a need to be in on the hotness. There are plenty of games to enjoy while those other ones get cheaper and cheaper. The launch day excitement/rush of discovery is always nice though and I do wish there was some kind of a “book club but for games” where a group could go in and have a fresh experience with a game that’s already released.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      One of those is dead.

      One is blocked by OP’s instance.

      One is hosted on an instance that more than a few people avoid.

      One is nearly empty, but maybe worth joining and starting some discussion? !patientgamers@lemmy.world

        • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Ah, so it is. I wonder when that happened. I guess .world might have outgrown beehaw’s ability to make up for spotty moderation.

      • Blaze@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The SJW one is fine, further centralization on LW is probably not desirable

          • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s a damn shame because I really like beehaw, it feels nice and cozy but they block too many instances. If it wasn’t for that I’d use it as my main. I hope they don’t block sdf. I like being able to comment and see post from beehaw

            • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I’m pretty sure they don’t block sdf. That’s where I am, and I’ve had several interactions with Beehaw folks while here. :)

              Fun fact: Beehaw and sdf are among the few well-known instances that don’t hand their users’ traffic (all their activity on Lemmy) over to Cloudflare.

              • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah they don’t. I’m just saying I hope they don’t in the future.

                I did not know that. The more I learn about sdf the more I love it.

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Excessively patient. I’ve noticed there’s basically a 50/50 chance of any game I find interesting showing up for free on Epic eventually, so I mean, fine, I’ll wait a couple of years to save $60. Why pay for something that’ll eventually be given to you, paid for by some vulture capitalist’s dragon horde?

    I take some of their money, get a free game: win/win.

    …at this point, I’m pretty sure my Epic games library is way bigger than my Steam library, simply from the 3-5 free games a month that Epic tosses at you, of which like 1/3rd are actually pretty good.

    • Nytixus@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What’s getting annoying now is that they’ve been tossing in like packs for freemium games. Gross. That’s not a game, guys, that’s an attempt to get us to spend more money if we’re to like this EXP/Skin pack you’ve given away.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah I’ve been noticing that. It’s probably a case of it being cheaper for them than games, but I’ve also noticed they’ve not yet done a cycle where it’s ONLY freemium stuff, at least.

        Next week, for example, is an Apex skin and a game. If it was JUST the skin I’d probably be less gruntled, but as it is, I find it hard to get too upset that I’m only getting 1 free game instead of 2.

    • altasshet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same! Waiting for it not to cost 80$ Canadian… If it goes on sale for half, I’ll buy it I guess

      • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        BG3 is self-published by Larian. Which sadly means you’re unlikely to see a 50% discount or above.

        Well, at least not anytime in the near future.

        It was 10% off at one point. So maybe 20% isn’t out of the question.

        • Nytixus@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Baldur’s Gate 3 is still a bit of a recent game, even if it’s a year old. Normally games like it, take about 3 - 5 years before we start seeing drastic sales.

          Now games that are over 10 years old and still being 10% off? Fuck out of here with that.

          • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I don’t know what your point is, but yes, BG3 is still a recent game.

            Therefor it’s unlikely we’ll see a higher discount anytime soon.

            • liminis@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Maybe more significantly, it’s a recent game with rave reviews that’s still making Larian money without the use of mtx and/or dlc.

              Aside, kinda expecting a lot of garbage D&D games since the endlessly greedy Hasbro has seen how much money it can make them. Doubt they’ll do anything other than miss the forest for the trees in their execution of that, though.

        • altasshet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Guess I’ll really have to work for being patient… Or I’ll just break down and buy it anyway at some point.

          • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Meh, of all the games… BG3 shouldn’t make you feel bad for buying. It’s one of the few games in recent memory that is worth the money in full, imo.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, at least not anytime in the near future.

          I think you underestimate how patient some of us can be… 😉

          • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not at all. And more power to you for that.

            I’m just saying it’s gonna be a while yet. 😉