Yeah, using the a750 the same.
Can’t wait for next Gen arc with vvc (x266) support.
Yeah, using the a750 the same.
Can’t wait for next Gen arc with vvc (x266) support.
Intel has excellent transcode, even in their igpus.
I use an arc750 specifically for transcode, av1 runs at ludicrous speeds, but don’t do an Nvidia, they kind of suck because they dont support vaapi, only nvenc/nvdec and vdpau.
02x03 - A Head in the Polls, arooo!!!
Yeah, the ryzens are great too.
Full amd will treat you well, I’m running dual xeons and a Radeon pro with an arc 770 just for av1 encode right now.
Next round going full epyc.
Amd knocks Nvidia into a hat on Linux, the drivers are just too incredible.
With the exception of AI, where Nvidia is just plain the gold standard.
Intel is fine, it has exceptional video encoding and works.
Core i3 is fine, celeron can route, but you don’t have as much headroom, or room for firewall rules, etc. Recommend Intel x520 or mellanox cx3 or newer, though the cx2 is perfectly fine.
The bs about bsd being slower is maybe 15 years old at best?
Bsd is a monster for routing.
Run 25gbe routing, still can get by on your 4 core, but I throw some serious xeons at it anyway.
Meh, I like my udm.
I use some of the features, but mostly it just works, and it’s debian under the hood so I just ssh in and unfuck whatever needs unfucking.
It’s vastly closer to a hand-built setup than anything else, and you can spend less time worrying about security.
Ollama, llama3.2, deepcode and a bunch of others.
Using a GPU but man they’re picky, they mostly want Nvidia gpus.
Do NOT be afraid to run on the cpu. It’s slow, but for 1 user it’s actually mostly fine.
Purring like a kitten.
To be fair, it was a controversial feature at the time, some people said it actually encouraged the development of btrfs as an alternative.
So VCN has caught up some, but QS is still faster, generally has better support and better codecs before VCN. Also has combinations, vainfo gives me something like 20 encoders on intel, 8 on amd, mostly stuff like 444 for each variant of hevc, etc. Also my 7600xt was more picky with which settings it would take, the intel block seems fairly comfortable with more.
My Xe has AV1 encode (at ludicrous speeds, I get 30x sometimes, it changed my flow entirely, I stream av1 only now), it’s had hevc well earlier than amd, and overall it’s usually a good bit faster (an intel igpu will usually encode faster than an amd dgpu).
Also quality has been reviewed to be better, feel free to google that, it’s apparently pretty marginal to human observers.
But like I said, the difference is nowhere like it was, AMD is catching up, software is coming together so vaapi covers most cases without complaint.
There’s no reason to consider the difference between them unless encoding is your primary focus, and you’re trying to use very modern codecs.
Basically.
I like the E and p cores, mostly because I used to do a lot of core architecture for supercomputer chips and this was one of my ideas I wanted to implement, fully heterogenous cores with Linux support for scheduling.
But no, there’s no reason to pick Intel, I only got it because it was cheap, and I don’t use it for gaming.
There is basically 1 reason to go Intel cpu: quicksync video encoding. Amd’s is fine but intel’s is the gold standard.
Otherwise definitely go amd, it rocks Nvidia perfectly.
It’s because they were annoying, whinging twats.
Not even whinging, screaming.
Think I have the Intel version and absolutely adore it. Everything works, it’s a monster and plays as a solid workstation with a low-end thunderbolt 3 dock.
You mean blizzard activision… :(
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
Man I’ve gotten old, gotten stuck in debian with lxc containers (Ubuntu for work, arch for fun) underneath.
Warm and loving on the outside, kinky as fuck behind closed doors.
Google is pushing av1 because of patents, but 266 is just plain better tech, even if it’s harder to encode.
This same shit happened with 265 and vp9, and before that, and before that with vorbis/opus/aac.
They’ll come back because it’s a standard, and has higher quality.
Maybe this is the one time somehow av1 wins out on patents, but I’m encoding av1 and I’m really not impressed, it’s literally just dressed up hevc, maybe a 10% improvement max.
I’ve seen vvc and it’s really flexible, it shifts gears on a dime between high motion and deep detail, which is basically what your brain sees most, while av1 is actually kind of worse than hevc at that to me, it’s sluggish at the shifts, even if it is better overall.