I am looking into password managers, as number of my accounts are increasing. Currently I am weighing two options:

  • Host Vaultwarden on a VPS, or
  • Use the free bitwarden service.

I want to know how they are in practical aspects.

While I am fine self-hosting many services, password managers seem to be one of the most critical services that should not admit downtime. I surely cannot keep it up, as I need to update it time to time.

On the other hand, using bitwarden might require some level of trust. How much should I trust the company to use the free service? How do I know if my passwords would be safe, not being exposed to the wide net?

I want to gauge pros and cons, are there aspects I missed? How are your opinions on this? If you are self-hosting vaultwarden, how do you manage the downtime? Thanks in advance!

  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    29 days ago

    I enjoy self hosting, but what tipped the scales for me in favor of using Bitwarden’s servers is that I’m 100% confident I’m not as good as hardening my system from being compromised as they are. The vault is going to be encrypted anyway, and I think there’s a lower chance of it falling into the wrong hands if it’s hosted with Bitwarden. Same reason I don’t self-host email.

    Plus Bitwarden is a cool company and the product is open source, and the premium features are unreasonably low priced.

  • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    29 days ago

    Bitwarden is dirt cheap. I can never host and be as reliable as they are for that price.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    30 days ago

    If I get hit by a bus, then the passwords for the things that my wife needs to settle things gets sent to her, and the infra isn’t something that I maintain and could be down.

    Worth $10/yr, by far.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Vaultwarden allows a bit of downtime, the vault is cached by the clients

    When the server is not reachable, no writes are allowed

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I had a similar dilemma and just went with bitwarden because I don’t trust myself not to fuck up. Bitwarden can’t access the passwords without my master pw (afaik) so I feel safe knowing that. I use it on all my devices so it gets synced there and even if the service is down, I have my passwords.

    I’ll self host it when I reach the next level of paranoia.

  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just a PSA for anybody reading the thread, though it doesn’t really help with the question at hand… On the very slim chance that your workplace uses Bitwarden Enterprise it’s worth knowing that every licensed user gets a free family plan that can be tied to an existing personal account, provided it’s hosted in the same region.

    We do use it but very few of our own users are even aware of the perk so I like to spread it around when I get the chance!

  • snroh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    add keepassxc to the list. I’ve avoided it for the longest times because I remember the horror that was the OG keepass. this is modern software, minimal footprint (miniscule compared to bitwarden’s electron crap), easy to use, the db is one file that’s easily syncthing-ed around, browser extensions, etc.

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I self host vaultwarden and its great. Its an easy self host, and in my experience, it has never gone down on me.

    That being said, my experience is anecdotal. If you do go the vaultwarden route, realize that your vault is still accessible on your devices (phone, whatever) even if your server goes down, or if you just lose network connectivity. They hold local (encrypted at rest) copies of your vault that are periodically updated.

    Additionally, regardless of the route you take you should absolutely be practicing a good 3-2-1 backup strategy with your password vault, as with any other data you value.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If in the future you think you might bring family/relations onboard to the password manager, it may be worthwhile to pay for a BitWarden family plan. BitWarden is really low-cost and they publish their stuff as FOSS (and therefore are worth supporting), but crucially you don’t want to be the point of technical support for when something doesn’t work for someone else. Self-hosting a password manager is an easier thing to do if you’re only doing it for yourself.

    That said, I use a self-hosted Vaultwarden server as backup (i.e. I manually bring the server online and sync to my phone now and again), and my primary password manager is through Keepassxc, which is a completely separate and offline password manager program.

    Edit: Forgot to mention, you can always start with free BitWarden and then export your data and delete your account if you decide to self-host.

    • MrPistachios@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      that was my thinking too, if something happened to me I dont want all my wifes passwords to be locked out so I made her an admin on the account as well to be able to continue paying for the service or export her passwords

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Vaultwarden has an “emergency access” feature so if something happens to me my wife can take over the account.

        I also added the kids to our “organization” but didn’t give them write permissions to their passwords yet so they can’t accidentally change something.

        I’m sure official bitwarden has those options too.

  • Object@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    One little bonus for using Vaultwarden is that you get access to premium features for free. But still, I put availability much higher when it comes to password management, so I would go with paid Bitwarden. That is what I did before moving to Keepass.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Bitwarden clients cache your data locally. So even if your Vaultwarden goes down, you’ll still be able to access your passwords. Just not sync new ones or make changes.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Do you have a proper backup solution? If you have a catastrophic data error, can you still recover? If not, just choose the hosted infrastructure.

    Self-hosting is great. I love it. But when it comes to critical things that you absolutely cannot fuck up, I would rather trust a consumer based solution. If you fuck up your passwords and they’re gone, it’s going to hinder you significantly more than losing sleep about some rando having all your passwords if they break scrypt encryption.

        • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Yeah, it says on their website you can export it from any Bitwarden app, and you can also do it from the CLI if you wanted to for some reason.

          Probably be easier in case of emergency to do it from the browser extension though, since you’re gonna have to set up the Vaultwarden server anyway and import the data.

          EDIT: So just to check, I installed Vaultwarden, and I was able to export the vault from both the browser extension and the iOS app, on top of the web UI.

  • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    On the other hand, using bitwarden might require some level of trust. How much should I trust the company to use the free service?
    How do I know if my passwords would be safe, not being exposed to the wide net?

    Wouldn’t these questions be as true of the VPS service that hosts Vaultwarden as of Bitwarden?
    If my internet at home was better I would be selfhosting Vaultwarden and use a full vpn on my laptop/phone/tablet when leaving the house.
    Now I’m using KeepassXC with my home pc as the true source and syncing copies of the database to my laptop and phone.

    • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, you don’t need to trust the VPS provider. The VaultaWarden password storage is encrypted, and the master password is never transmitted to the server. The passwords are decrypted only locally on your device.