ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1240arrow-down110
arrow-up1230arrow-down1imageIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareBlaster M@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 months agoInteresting to see how many features NTFS does support
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 months agoThat’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS. Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoNot sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoI’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 months agoOops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
minus-squarePrison Mike@links.hackliberty.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.
Interesting to see how many features NTFS does support
That’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS.
Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
Not sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
I’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
Oops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
Yeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.