ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 27 days agoIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1240arrow-down110
arrow-up1230arrow-down1imageIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 27 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareBlaster M@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·26 days agoInteresting to see how many features NTFS does support
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·26 days agoThat’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS. Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·26 days agoNot sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·26 days agoI’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11·26 days agoOops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
minus-squarePrison Mike@links.hackliberty.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·26 days agoYeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.
Interesting to see how many features NTFS does support
That’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS.
Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
Not sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
I’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
Oops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
Yeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.