Agent Karyo@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoNintendo's lawsuit against Palworld isn't just bad for the industry, it's bad for Nintendowww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down126
arrow-up1284arrow-down1external-linkNintendo's lawsuit against Palworld isn't just bad for the industry, it's bad for Nintendowww.pcgamer.comAgent Karyo@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squarepyrflie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down8·edit-22 months agoThe patent expired 10 years ago at the latest and even then It’s an Idea patent so they are squatting to quash innovation. Pokemon are at best patent trolls.
minus-squareStovetop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·2 months agoHard to know if the patent is expired when they haven’t even officially announced which ones they plan to bring forward in the suit. The only info I was aware of so far is that there were multiple claims they were making.
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·2 months agoNot disagreeing, just pointing out it’s not a traditional copyright claim like so many others we see.
The patent expired 10 years ago at the latest and even then It’s an Idea patent so they are squatting to quash innovation. Pokemon are at best patent trolls.
Hard to know if the patent is expired when they haven’t even officially announced which ones they plan to bring forward in the suit.
The only info I was aware of so far is that there were multiple claims they were making.
Not disagreeing, just pointing out it’s not a traditional copyright claim like so many others we see.
What patent are you referring to?