• ChanSecodina@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    5 months ago

    It was the style at the time! Lots of CD players had flip up tops, as did the Sega Saturn. I assume it was because the slide out tray mechanism was more expensive and also more fragile.

  • sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s almost like they were designed around something round… I call it the data-wheel!

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      How many of these data wheels will the machine be able to use?

      • sramder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Vast libraries of such disks once existed but we are unsure of what happened to them… but our scientists have identified a solid layer of polycarbonate about 50 feet down from the planets surface that may extend for miles.

  • tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    You need a CD flap, and that’s the biggest visible feature of the console, so best to make it the centrepiece, and design around it. And CDs are circular so yeah, let’s follow that in the design.

    You need two buttons, one for power and one for open. Symmetry is always appealing, so make them symmetrical and balanced on both sides.

    Very much an example of “form follows function”

    • tuckerm@supermeter.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This post made me realize just how few consoles had a CD flap. Is it just the Playstation, Dreamcast, Saturn, and Gamecube? Kind of weird how that was the default for CD players pretty much forever, but not many consoles went with that. PS2, Xbox, and everything after those had some kind of tray or slot. Maybe it was because they could visually stand apart from their competitors more that way.

      • SlothMama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        For some perspective, CD trays, like the PS2 and Xbox had, that retracted mechanically were viewed as sleek and futuristic, and that’s why slot loaders like the Wii and PS3 gained traction too.

        It was an aesthetic choice, like the move from green LEDs to blue, though that has historic significant as blue LEDs are a relatively recent invention as the were incredibly difficult to figure out, so blue LEDs were seen as futuristic and opulent and used in everything consumer electronics for a while.

      • kaboom36@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The PS2 slim has a CD flap, that might be the last console to have one

        There’s also whatever is going on with the PS3 super slim but I think that is in a category of its own

      • gasgiant@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cost. I think all of the 5th generation were top loaders. On the cd audio side nice stackable separates were tray or slot. Cheap stand-alones were top.

        6th was a split but then I think the perception of slot or tray loading being more prestigious moved everyone to slot/tray.

        Plus I think top loaders might have been less secure. I certainly remember a number of physical mods or swap techniques that defeated top loader security very easily.

        Same thing happened with videos as well. Started with manual top loaders and then moved to slot.

      • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        The original Xbox had a tray because it was basically a PC, and had a standard IDE CD-ROM with some minor changes. They weren’t standing apart, they were following the new standard of the time, PCs, and it was probably more to do with cost savings by using common parts. They also had a standard IDE HDD. Even their weird proprietary controller port they used on the original Xbox is just USB! Its the same wires, they just screwed up the pinout. you can replace one of those weird controller ports with a normal female USB and then plug all sorts of USB devices into the Xbox and they just work.

        I only single out the Xbox because I’ve taken them apart, I imagine the PS2 is similar. At least PS2 didn’t intentionally mess up their USB ports.

  • MacedWindow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    Seems like efficient design. Cords on the back, disc tray on the top with a couple buttons. Really the Gamecube is basically the same thing.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The PSX design was still similar for the Nintendo Prototypes as well. Was just the design style at the time for cheaper optical drive housing. GameCube all also had a flip-top lid for the basic commercial release.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          But PS1 and PSX are both retail product names for different systems, I don’t see calling the Wii “Revolution”…

        • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It was never officially named PSX, but it was called that way by people for some reason. I guess to differentiate the fat and slim versions.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            The name spread at the time even before the release of the console, so everyone called it that, even websites listed it as PSX. The slim PSOne version came much later, arguably even too late to be of any significance for anyone or anything.

        • SlothMama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Literally untrue I promise, even worse, you’re extra wrong because the PSX is actually the name of a Japanese specific set top entertainment box that also played PS2 games and was the introduction of the XMB ( Cross Media Bar ) interface that the PSP and PS3 both used.

          The small PlayStation did have the official designation of PSOne though.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Are you some infantile bot or why do you keep repeating what’s already been addressed? lol It was PSX, everyone called it PSX, even websites called it PSX. I know because I had one. You can even still see in the wiki page that its codename was PSX.

            • smeg@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Confusingly (and as I discovered in this thread) the name “PSX” is both the release name for the ps2/recorder and the code name for the original PlayStation.

              The PlayStation (abbreviated as PS, commonly known as the PS1/PS one or its codename PSX)

              Not to be confused with PSX (digital video recorder) or PlayStation Experience.

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_(console)

              So technically you’re both right and both wrong!