And why do you use them?

    • yala@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yup, as time went on, I simply felt less need to have proprietary software on my system. Steam remains as an exception; simply by virtue of having no F(L)OSS alternative (AFAIK).

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 month ago

        Steam itself isn’t that special and things like Heroic exist but where Steam wins is the ecosystem. Also Valve sponsor developments of Linux desktop technologies, so even if Steam itself is proprietary, some of the money ends up advancing open source.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I won’t say it’s “best”, as I just want to run a game without friendlists and other bloat, so I really hate the fact Steam is nessesary for so many games.

      But I would call it “essentiall”.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Valve has put a lot of work into helping WINE & Linux. Even if it was a selfish play to break free from Microsoft & other app stores to lock those into their marketplace fee, I can’t help but be grateful for the better ecosystem & uptick in users. Since they are privately held too, they aren’t in the same business of chasing quartely profits or making the experience worse & worse by selling your data & slapping ads everywhere.

    • Lantern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Was going to say this. Pycharm is probably the only paid software I use. With that being said, students don’t need to pay for it, so I don’t have to worry about that.

  • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    DaVinci Resolve is THE video editor on Linux. Unfortunately the libre apps for it don’t get even close, to the point that even with all the limitations in the free and paid versions, it still is the best option.

    Also shout out to Bitwig Studio, although I don’t use it.

    • Gamma@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can you run it on anything besides cent yet? I tried it a few years ago and it fell flat on its face

      • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        it totally does, it’s pretty easy to install and run on regular distros and just a bit more work to do in immutable ones, but with davincibox it’s bound to get better

  • Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reaper. Great usability and decent Linux support out of the box (looking at you, davinci resolve). Generous free trial and a cheap one-time payment for a license. LMMS has served me well and is fine for basic stuff, but reaper is a whole other level, both in features and usability. I’ve heard good things about ardour too but have yet to give it a try.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    Half-life: Alyx, Baldur’s Gate 3, Elden Ring, … you get the idea. It’s not so much those apps per se, and I’d prefer them to be FLOSS too, rather it’s the amazing content and in such rare cases, I’m happy to financially support the creators.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What aren’t you happy to financially support creators of open source software you like?

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        My formulation wasn’t clear, I meant to say I’m happy to support creators in general that make quality content, software or not, but I would always prefer to support open source, open hardware, remixable content, etc rather than closed and proprietary alternatives. I listed games as very rare examples where I’m still happy to support them even if I still wish that the software itself would be made open, even if delayed as Quake or Doom for examples have been. Does it make more sense now?

  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Does it count as paid if I donated what I think is a reasonable price?
    Cause then it’s KDE, Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice and Gimp. I’d prefer those programs even if their proprietary counterparts were free.

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Came here to say this too… I contribute a few €/£/$ per month to various projects…

      I won’t get all righteous here, but just because you don’t have to pay, doesn’t mean you to say you can’t support the developer(s)…

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would never willingly use proprietary software. I don’t mind paying if I also have access to source code that is licensed foss.

      • biribiri11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d love to see a complete CAD package that feels more in line with Inventor. Ondsel is definitely getting there, but it’s PDM (like git, but for parametric CAD) is still closed source and not self-hostable. Their git repo is also a bit confusing. Apparently part of their patchset on the “flavor” branch they ship isn’t open to the public? Still, nice to see a (partially) FOSS solution.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, and what does it change for the purpose of this post? The question wasn’t what’s the best software you use in your leisure time for non-work purposes.

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I while I understand the sentiment, I have found that paid software is more polished than foss software… most of the time. And when I need to get work done, I want to ensure that my software is stable and I will pay to do so.

      That said, I feel software is like a bell curve, and the older the type of software is, the more it should be FOSS. Like word processors, 3D modelling, or image manipulation should be foss, while video editing and 3D scanning software is OK to be paid.

      What I feel everyone should agree with is not being forced to use a subscription service to use the software. I will boycott software if it forces that upon their customers, looking at you Adobe, Autodesk and Microsoft.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wish that was possible, but it’s not feasible to get a lot done on a 15 year old ThinkPad or whatever, that doesn’t have any proprietary firmware.

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I paid for Vuescan. There are a ton of Linux scanning apps, but pretty much all of them require editing all pictures to some extent after the scan. Vuescan applies a useful set of defaults that work for most pictures, speeding up the work flow. I had over 4,000 pictures to scan so anything to simplify that was worth it.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I think you’re right. I forgot to add that there’s no mucking about with drivers and all of that, it really just works. Older scanners usually aren’t a problem with Linux, but Vuescan almost certainly supports them as well.

    • 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s so odd how proprietary software is frowned upon so much in this community, but no one cares when it comes to gaming.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even Stallman said games are an unfortunate, but reasonable exception. Of he can see it, anyone can.

      • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It is a bit different. Have you invested thousands of hours developing skills with a piece of productivity software, and locked your data into their proprietary data format? Has that vendor looked at your investment, and found that they have plenty of leverage to turn the screws on you?

        With a game, you invest tens of hours developing skills, lock your “master sword” in a proprietary save format, and then you save the princess. After that, you’re done. It is an ephemeral experience, give or take wanting to replay a few really good games. The game vendor doesn’t have that much hold over you, and their grip doesn’t get stronger the more you use it. I can replace your game with hundreds of other games, and I don’t really lose anything by doing so.

        • 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I absolutely agree with you, but look at launchers and such. Steam is very much proprietary and commercial. I find it a little odd that those who might do anything to avoid proprietary software, willingly use it for gaming.

          Those are just my thoughts.

    • ffhein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have some hobby projects in Python but I’ve never needed the pro features, I do pay for Clion though

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lightburn for controlling laser engravers.

    It’s pretty much the only choice on Linux (though it is cross platform). Free 30 day trial, then ~$80 lifetime licence.

    The other choice is LaserGRBL, which is open source, but doesn’t seem to have a Linux port for some reason. And it has a lot fewer features, with a more complex workflow.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    gitkraken has a lot of features that I never use. But showing the various branches and their connections as a color-coded tree is worth paying money for.

  • dwemthy@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dungeondraft, Wonderdraft, FoundryVTT. Battle map making, world map making, and virtual table top respectively

    • Dreyns@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I know you can’t make battle maps with it but have you hear of azgaar ? It’s an awesome open source world map maping web app !