• JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m surprised that other people are surprised that for-profit companies constantly try to increase their profits; such companies only contribute to FOSS when that’s more profitable than the alternative. The Linux kernel, AMDGPU, Steam, etc only exist because some part of the software/hardware stack is proprietary (which becomes a more attractive product as the FOSS portion of the stack improves).

    I’m definitely not justifying the “rug-pulling”, but people need to stop supporting projects with no potential for long-term profitability unless those projects can survive without any support from for-profit companies. Anything else is destined to fail.

    • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      people need to stop supporting projects with no potential for long-term profitability unless those projects can survive without any support from for-profit companies.

      You see the contradiction here right?

        • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Open source projects have no potential for long term profitability unless those projects get support from for profit companies, thus compromising the nature of open source.

          • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not all FOSS projects need to be profitable to survive. IOW if a project cannot survive without being profitable and it cannot be profitable long-term, then it cannot survive long-term.