Hi all, I’m a Lemmy FOSS app contributor that’s made a couple of tools for people starting small instances including Lemmy Community Seeder (LCS) for building content on new server’s All Feeds and Lemmy Post Purger (LPP) for clearing old posts on smaller instances.

Today I’m releasing Lemmy Defederation Sync (LDS). When launching a new Lemmy instance, administrators may not understand the necessity of defederation with problem instances. Using LDS, you can sync your instance’s “blocked instance” list with that of another server(s) whose admins you trust.

  • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a sysadmin that’s a terrible analogy:

    1. Shared email Blocklists are the norm, not the exception
    2. As a professional IT admin I would absolutely blackhole any vile hives of scum and villainy rather than dealing with their BS. If someone is going to do that for me I’ll use the tool.
    • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Also a sysadmin.

      > Shared email Blocklists are the norm, not the exception

      Shared blocklists in IT are managed by industry professionals for the purpose of safety from malicious activity and there are vetted processes for being removed from days lists. False positives happen, but you aren’t hung out to dry if you get hit, you just go through the process and clear your name.

      Most of this “Fediblock” nonsense is several orders of magnitude less reliable, and filled with toxic people pursing personal grudges. There’s no process to clear your name, and I’ve personally watched multiple admins and their entire communities be publicly mocked and told they “don’t owe you anything” for merely asking why they were blocked, let alone how to remedy the situation.

      These are not remotely equivalent and anybody who trusts them is a fool. The Fediverse has a serious problem with vile, bitter people who would not be out of place running an HOA. If we are going to emulate the blocklists common in IT, we need professionals in charge of it, not nosy busybodies.

      • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        we need professionals in charge of it, not nosy busybodies.

        Great, you form the not-for-profit company to manage this and get the buy-in from a critical mass of servers. Gold luck finding and vetting staff

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The point is valid though The fact that they’re not going to set up the solution doesn’t invalidate their core message.

          I can equally point out that you’re not providing a viable solution either.

    • Southern Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Read my other reply, I’m not talking about email blocklists, my reference is to email providers doing that, which is extremely rare and done with explicit intent and good reason.

      Secondly, while I won’t disagree there’s some vile content out there on the Fediverse, do you trust someone else to make that decision for you? Why would you let someone else decide what is and isn’t vile for you and those using your instance? Better yet, how would you feel if some popular instance decides you were the vile one, and because it was a common instance to use for blocking references, your instance is now cut off from a good chunk of the Fediverse?

      This is exactly the sort of nonsense that swept Twitter with shared Blocklists, and the potential for negative impact on the Fediverse is even worse from it. Don’t let others decide make decisions for you just because it’s easy, as it doesn’t absolve you of responsibility when something goes wrong.

      • Gamey@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Now you compare EMails aka mostly private communication to a public forum, that’s even dummer…

        • Southern Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The ActivityPub standard is modeled on email. Each instance is a server, and we all have inboxes. It’s a very apt comparison to use.

          Also, unless the email is E2EE, then it’s not private, no more meaningfully so anyways.