Personally I would not recommend an iPhone to an elderly person. They are not going to use 99% of the features anyway so what’s the point in buying an expensive phone when you can get them a cheap Samsung for 150 bucks.
The justification used to be that IOS was a friendlier interface but I think a combination of Android getting better and iOS getting worse means that that’s no longer the case. Hell their new design apparently makes everything transparent and hard to see.
Physical buttons for brightness is a bad idea. People will just press them by accident and then complain that the screen changes brightness all the time. Laptops get away with it because they already have a bajillion buttons, and anyway in most cases the screen brightness buttons are actually multifunctional anyway so it doesn’t add to the button count.
And they keep repeating “I’m not a computer person” as if that’s some kind of excuse.
You can’t bring a lawsuit for something you think might happen.
It’s been out like a week I don’t think there’s been time for anyone to experience stick drift yet.
The problem is that it requires disassembling the controller. Apparently that’s a quite the pain for the switch 2
They’ll just get sued again if they try that.
I’ve never had stick drift with PlayStation or Xboxes despite people telling me it’s a problem. The switch though is awful for it.
I don’t know what they do to make their analogue sticks so bad but they’re definitely getting them from the world’s cheapest supplier, apparently one that even Sony and Microsoft turned up their noses to.
Well I suppose you’ve got to protect where they’ll see it.
Of course there’s always being Nazi apologists and equally there’s always been people who are just incapable of moving with the times. That’s not a new thing that’s always been the case.
I think I had it on my wish list because I was never going to pay full price and then when it came down in price I looked again at it and I just thought nah, I actually don’t care. So I never bought it.
They’re not exactly starting from a solid foundation.
If any game was going to get away with being $80 it’d be something like grand theft auto or one of the next call of duties, not this one. But maybe they’re trailing it on a game that they know will only be moderately successful at best anyway, that way they don’t lose huge amounts of money if it fails to win over players.
That tactic would work if it was a multiplayer game or a major franchise but with a single player cookie cutter game there’s no urgency for me to get started and no FOMO. It just isn’t that interesting of an IP
Wasn’t the first game entirely average? And now he wants $80 for the sequel.
I would agree normally but it’s Lenovo.
The only games I truly enjoyed these days have been unexpected indie hits that are impossible to predict
You have to keep an eye out for dev diaries on YouTube. Normally there is some advisement for them.
The list where this doesn’t apply seems to basically be every country with consumer protection laws.
They obviously know this won’t fly pretty much anywhere other than the US so that’s all they’re trying to push.
The big problem is that half the time the answer that you get is that you shouldn’t be in the situation you’re in so the question doesn’t apply.
Well yeah, but here’s the thing, if I ask the question it’s because I am in the situation I’m in, and therefore need assistance. So telling me that the situation I’m in is not optimal is literally the least helpful thing one could do.
At least now I don’t have to deal with the rudeners.
I do like the fact that when I ask it a question it actually gives me the answer, and doesn’t tell me to refactor my entire code because apparently I’m a bad person.
You have to etch them with Eldritch potions on the mystical and long-lost island of Ti-wo-ann.
Is usually around this point in time that they admit that they haven’t actually got the computer in front of them. I guess they’re just trying to memorise the instructions or something.