• TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      In true EFF fashion. Their second server / backup MX is hosted at some other smaller company so things could be worse, at least their MX as a non Microsoft alternative.

      Either way I can get this, they most likely have hundreds of people using Microsoft products, like Office 365, and Outlook’s compatibility with IMAP is a joke. They most likely also don’t want to run a serious in-house email infraestruture capable of handling that load. All reasons might have driven them to Microsoft / O365.

      This is usually what happens, when your company is big you can’t make it with open-source without tons of extra costs and complexities. Sad but true.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hell, even SMB really can’t easily/cost-effectively run without MS.

        Sad, but true.

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Unfortunately it can’t either be run in a solid and stable way EVEN with MS. The Windows’ SMB client sucks as well.