• zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    Could this be considered discrimination? Rejecting applicant based on something they have no control over and unrelated to the position.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        … yet.

        You arent going to write protections until it becomes apparent they are needed.

        Stupidest timeline? Maybe

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Discrimination as such I don’t think so but under the new EU AI regulations they’d be in a world of hurt. For one, did they tell OP that the answer was AI-generated and, as this is a high-risk use of AI, did they include a link to report incidents, do they have human oversight, can they prove that they monitored the AI properly, that it was created with risk management in mind?

      • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Probably not. It’s super expensive to do it properly. Definitely in the millions of dollars range.

    • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      A good lawyer could probably argue a case for age discrimination.

      After all, if they were one day older or younger, they would not have been summarily denied.