Koichi Miura is an artist who’s been working in the industry since 1999. He previously worked on Ridge Racer V, R: Racing Evolution and Time Crisis 5 for Bandai Namco, as well as Kingdom Hearts HD II.8 and Kingdom Hearts 3 for Square Enix.

Miura is credited as a landscape artist on The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom but, as reported by Automaton, he recently posted on X (formerly Twitter) to say he had quit the company because he felt it was only suitable for people who were abnormally gifted at game devlopment.

“Nintendo is an incredible company, but I wouldn’t lightly recommend it to others,” Miura said (translated by Automaton).

“It was like a haven for geniuses and superhumans, but for an average person like me, it was hell. However, thanks to this, I was able to realise that I wasn’t suited for the role and found the confidence I needed to pursue other goals.

“This was the biggest accomplishment that working for Nintendo brought me. I don’t have a single regret for having aspired to work there , getting the job, and then ultimately quitting it.”

To avoid any misunderstanding, Miura reiterated that he felt Nintendo was “a really good company”, that “the staff were wonderful people”, and that he was “amazed they could produce such great products one after the other”.

In a separate tweet, Miura shared that he earned less than $40,000 at Bandai Namco between 1999 and 2015, that he earned more than $46,000 working at Square Enix, and that when he moved to Nintendo in 2019 he started earning over $70,000.

Miura noted that game industry salaries aren’t often revealed in Japan, but as a freelancer no longer looking for permanent employment, he thought it would be helpful to reveal his salary information to others in the hope that it would improve working conditions and transparency.

  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I’m shocked how low the pay was for the lead artist behind the Zelda landscape. Or is that normal pay for this category?

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Salaries in Japan are fairly low. Though that is offset by a comparatively low cost-of-living.

      Additionally, depending on when the currency conversions were done, the yen tanked dramatically in the last few years, leading to salaries appearing even lower when converted to dollars.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Uncertain about that.

        As a tourist there, prices were equivalent to a small town in America. I live in a big expensive city. Japan, Lunch was about $10 (about $15 where I live).

        But also, that artist with all of his decades of experience, working as a prestigious place like Nintendo, was making what we’d pay someone with 3years experience at a no-name company.

        Nintendo definitely isn’t compensating people correctly.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          How else does a company accumulate riches. Although work culture is drastically different in japan.

        • criticon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ¥1000 (usual set lunch in Japan) ≠ $10

          As a tourist I found Japan to be the cheapest developed country. I also spent about 4 months total in business trips and I found funny that I’d get ~$120 allowance in Japan but I’d spend ~$30 every day unless I went to a super high class restart

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean it depends on country. Keep in mind that in the US by comparison you earn a lot but cost of living is high + you need to pay for a lot of things yourself, so the number can be misleading.

      I would be more interested in seeing comparisons with other fields of work.

      • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lived in Japan my entire working life, 10million yen (70k USD) is really good. The average salary in Tokyo is around 6m for tech, but if you’re single and living within your means, 4~5m is perfectly acceptable.

    • Daxtron2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s sort of the game industry in general, low wages, shit hours, high turnover.

    • ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Human capital is the most expensive direct cost of business. Reducing it as much as possible is the goal of any business.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s the game industry for you, especially outside of USA. Tech salaries in general are somewhat low outside of USA.

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s very low. I know a QA game tester who makes that much in California, and $70k is essentially almost poverty income in the Bay Area and LA county.

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        70k is literally poverty wages in SF. The poverty line is like 80k for singles and 118k for families.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, that’s one way to retain superior talent.

    But yes, it’s always specifically irritating to be around people much smarter and more talented than you. You literally can’t understand them much of the time, by the time your brain has processed one thing they’re saying, they’ve covered two more.

    And no matter how smart you are, unless you’re the actual statistical top dog, some people out there can do this to you.

    I always feel a touch bad for those people that did really, really well in HS and then go to college. That’s where I learned this anyway, I had just been the biggest fish in what was actually a pathetically small pond. Universities and professional workforces are not so small though, and they finally get barriers to entry, where everyone isn’t supposed to start at a certain age and eventually succeed. Was certainly a shock. lol

    • Cosmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t disagree with any of this, but I do also want to point out that it can sometimes be difficult to distinguish between “everyone here is smarter and more talented than me” and “everyone here has more experience than me at this particular thing”. Because when you’re a small-pond fish that is suddenly thrown into the big pond, it doesn’t necessarily mean you don’t belong. However, you can still get that shock when you can’t follow discussions as fluidly (and that’s how to get imposter syndrome)!

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a really good point too. It’s amazing how much of it is just acquirable skill instead of any kind of inherent quality, and you can’t really distinguish the difference from the starting line either.

        Like, as simple an example as technical vocabulary and jargon. Without knowledge its all gibberish, but with just a little bit of time and effort, it begins to all become readable.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its part of the reason why if youre interested in Nintendo specifically, youre better off working for monolith soft.

      They often directly help nintendo in various projects (like Bandai now), and is primarily staffed by reletively younh people with different ideas, not tied to any traditional game design. When monolith is making a Xenoblade game, its usually a passion project that nintendo allows for because realistically speaking, the devs helping out with projects like Zelda/Animal Crossing and such makes more monetary sense. The passion project sense is also what allows each xenoblade to be fairly unique, despite all of them being jrpgs in the same series.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was probably plain old hell for everyone, he just decided not to put up with it anymore.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While that certainly could be a conclusion drawn from this single source, we have alot of sources of people who have worked for Nintendo for more than a decade and love it.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, pretty much. But he probably can’t outright criticize Nintendo if he wants to keep receiving any game development work in Japan, so he does the classic, “negative feedback balanced with positive praise.”