• BerührtGras@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah maybe, but it’s important to cross message otherwise you loose against the scale effect of Whatsapps userbase

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Smaller services like Signal wouldn’t be forced to do it though, since they don’t pass the threshold to be considered a gatekeeper.

      So we’ll have a situation where WhatsApp is forced to open up, but barely any of the private services will actually make use of it.

      I can also see WhatsApp users being even less motivated to switch to better alternatives if everything was interoperable, so we go right back to its huge userbase being a problem anyway.

      Idk, I honestly don’t see this law changing much in the messaging space. Though I will never disagree with consumers having more options.

      • BerührtGras@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d like to use signal as my daily messaging App. But all my friends are on wa. If I can cross message them from signal, I will stay on signal. One less user for whatsapp.

        • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          We’ll see how it plays out. Have the lawmakers even thought about if and how services have to inform users between one another about their respective TOS?

          Like, I wouldn’t want to connect to another service before being presented with their terms and privacy policy. Only then should I be able to make a (now informed) decision on whether I want to do it or not.

          I guess it all boils down to why you use a certain service. I use Signal to avoid having my messages handled by a service that belongs to Meta. Texting with a WhatsApp user would defeat the whole point for me.