• miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Smaller services like Signal wouldn’t be forced to do it though, since they don’t pass the threshold to be considered a gatekeeper.

    So we’ll have a situation where WhatsApp is forced to open up, but barely any of the private services will actually make use of it.

    I can also see WhatsApp users being even less motivated to switch to better alternatives if everything was interoperable, so we go right back to its huge userbase being a problem anyway.

    Idk, I honestly don’t see this law changing much in the messaging space. Though I will never disagree with consumers having more options.

    • BerührtGras@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d like to use signal as my daily messaging App. But all my friends are on wa. If I can cross message them from signal, I will stay on signal. One less user for whatsapp.

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        We’ll see how it plays out. Have the lawmakers even thought about if and how services have to inform users between one another about their respective TOS?

        Like, I wouldn’t want to connect to another service before being presented with their terms and privacy policy. Only then should I be able to make a (now informed) decision on whether I want to do it or not.

        I guess it all boils down to why you use a certain service. I use Signal to avoid having my messages handled by a service that belongs to Meta. Texting with a WhatsApp user would defeat the whole point for me.