Critical thinking is hindered with group think. Thanks for objectively reviewing my comment history.

If that is how you evaluate individuals, I wouldn’t accept the invite. Principle means more than some invite to an indexer.

Invitations and referrals do carry liability. However, I would say that if you have a differing opinion, others attack with little regard. The “mob mentality” is inert and affluent in social media. Then you are left to defend your differing viewpoint, leaving a trail of more dissenting comments which are also attacked to the nth degree. I honestly thought this federated experiment would be different. I was wrong.

Thanks. We reached that dystopian part where people are judged based on their social credits and “likability” and conformance index to the masses.

We may not all think alike or obtain the same Linux ISOs. I am okay with that and feel we all should be okay with differing opinions and viewpoints, especially in a secular society.

I defended the comedian Dave Chapelle and questioned the term “toxic masculinity” in 2 posts which lead to a long (and apparently scrutinized) comment history.