https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-put-and-patch-request/

It’s the API’s job to validate it either way. As it does that job, it may as well parse the string as an integer.

Squashing

The s “squash” command is where we see the true utility of rebase. Squash allows you to specify which commits you want to merge into the previous commits. This is what enables a “clean history.” During rebase playback, Git will execute the specified rebase command for each commit. In the case of squash commits, Git will open your configured text editor and prompt to combine the specified commit messages. This entire process can be visualized as follows:

Note that the commits modified with a rebase command have a different ID than either of the original commits. Commits marked with pick will have a new ID if the previous commits have been rewritten.

https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/rewriting-history

You can also amend for a softer approach, which works better if you don’t push to remote after every commit.

The git commit --amend command is a convenient way to modify the most recent commit. It lets you combine staged changes with the previous commit instead of creating an entirely new commit. It can also be used to simply edit the previous commit message without changing its snapshot. But, amending does not just alter the most recent commit, it replaces it entirely, meaning the amended commit will be a new entity with its own ref. To Git, it will look like a brand new commit, which is visualized with an asterisk (*) in the diagram below.

You can keep amending commits and creating more chunky and meaningful ones in an incremental way. Think of it as converting baby steps into an adult step.

and also !fuckcars@lemmy.world

Who would use that kind of type coercion? Who? I want to see his face.

The point would be to make wealth/money toxic. The more you hoard, the less likely you are to survive.

And it’s good.

It is, but I suck at it. Hopefully, someone will grab the screenshot and make it into a meme.

Reload in “Reader View” or something similar, the paywall is weak.

It’s about the complex rationalizations used to create excuses (pretexts).

The original is this:

It’s used for updates. I’m not sure if it works all the time.

I think that it used to be called superfetch in the old days. https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/superfetch-service-disable-helps-to-increase-speed/3c4d5b4b-edef-4eb7-9456-52fd304e606c

If you’re using an “unofficial” license, it’s probably normal to disable updates and afferent services.

I remember from years ago when I was modding Windows XP installations with nLite to try to purge all the unnecessary bits and install some useful stuff. Superfetch was this annoying service that supposedly ruined online gaming due to lag. :)

Right-click on the Sound icon, then Sound Settings.

You get to: System > Sound

You can do stuff directly in the first panel, but scroll down:

System > Sound > All Sound Devices

Find your Display there, it could look like:

Click on it.

The first option in the detail view is to toggle it as a sound “output” device:

The options are “Allow” or “Don’t allow”. Once it’s blocked, it’s no longer in the list of options for switching easily between sound output devices (automatically or manually).

This is excellent

No. Users should be forced to install hundreds of apps, with two thirds of apps running simultaneously. And if they don’t have memory left on the device for that, they should uninstall apps and reinstall them when necessary.

^/s

I’m guessing that it’s a way for them to test if ads have been loaded after initial scripts have run, but I’m not going to dig into the code.

Honestly, the whole ads thing is missing the point. If you desired a public video hosting platform, that needs to be a tax-funded commons. Video hosting and streaming is very expensive. Similarly, users should be donating to keep Lemmy going:

https://opencollective.com/mastodonworld

https://patreon.com/mastodonworld

Ah, yes, let’s have thousands of specialized apps, each with uniquely expiring dependencies and vulnerabilities, instead of one browser that can work with apps that are standardized for OSS, UI, accessibility, performance, inspection by humans and machines, and security.

That’s not a WEB browser, that’s a Googleverse browser.

Conservationists are not the same as conservatives.

The only thing that conservatives are trying to conserve is their own privilege and impunity.

Conservative is the wrong word there