• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • steltek@lemm.eetoProgrammer Humor@programming.devD or d come on
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s how to fix this[+]

    Create $HOME/.config/user-dirs.dirs with

    XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR=“$HOME/downloads”

    You may need to logout/in for things to reread this file.

    The full list of keys is:

    • XDG_DESKTOP_DIR
    • XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR
    • XDG_TEMPLATES_DIR
    • XDG_PUBLICSHARE_DIR
    • XDG_DOCUMENTS_DIR
    • XDG_MUSIC_DIR
    • XDG_PICTURES_DIR
    • XDG_VIDEOS_DIR

    +: Since this is Linux, this is a fix for many but not all cases.




  • I’m obviously a fan of LE but a simple self-hosted option with a custom CA would be great for local machines:

    • I don’t want every Raspberry Pi/laptop/temp VM/whatever published into the cert transparency record
    • Configuring the router to forward every local hostname to the machine’s .well-known would be awful (if my ISP even allowed port 80)
    • Exposing local machines to the Internet is an unnecessary degradation of security

  • No one seems to mention license considerations when talking about static linking. Even if your app is open source, your particular license may not be legally compatible with the GPL, for example. 3BSD, MIT, and Apache most likely don’t change in a single binary but it’s kind of a new thing that no one was really thinking of before when mixing licenses together.

    I think this default okay assumption comes from most developers having a cloud-centric view where there’s technically no “distribution” to trigger copyright.







  • Let me return the appreciation for a thoughtful response! Unfortunately I don’t have an equal abundance of time (nor fast typing skills). Where’s the outcry for the parent class?

    Those cube dwellers (labor) are often better compensated and lead more secure, comfortable lives than small business owners (ownership). If you instead frame the problem as income inequality rather than straight up Marxism, I think you’re still naturally led to the tax reforms you’re describing. However, I don’t view that as “anti-capitalist”. It’s restoring guardrails that shouldn’t have been removed under Reagan.




  • Sorry I gotta provide some counterbalance here. This is a very dated Marxist perspective that I think is missing some modern fundamentals. Dividing the world into “ownership class” and “labor class” is simplistic thinking from the Industrial Revolution and doesn’t hold up anymore without modifications. Your typical high salary cube dweller is neither ownership nor identifiably labor. If you’re negatively classifying labor as “not ownership”, you’re talking about 99.9%+ of the population and it’s a rather meaningless distinction and unhelpful in discussing policy.





  • steltek@lemm.eetoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhy are folks so anti-capitalist?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not illogical to be pro-Capitalism while not owning any “means of production” if it means you still have better outcomes.

    There are no true Capitalist countries and no true Socialist countries. It’s not even a spectrum; it’s a giant mixed bag of policies. You can be for some basic capitalist principles (market economy, privately held capital) and for some socialist policies (safety nets, healthcare) and not be in contradiction with yourself. There’s more to capitalism than the United States.

    I think OP was seeing a lot of “burn the system down” talk. Revolutions aren’t bloodless, instantaneous, or well directed. Innocent people will die and generations will suffer. It’s stuff only the naive, the malicious, or the truly desperate will support. And if you’re here posting it on the daily, I don’t believe you’re that desperate.


  • Can you point to a socialist country where it has resulted in better outcomes than its peers? Cuba might be a contender but then there’s also Venezuela next door…

    I do not consider China to be a socialist country. It is a market economy where your average Foxconn employee no more controls the means of production than your average Detroit autoworker. My understanding is that China doctrine states socialism is one big long term TODO (with ever moving goalposts), requiring their economy and material wealth to have grown first. Well, you can’t deny it’s grown but I’m still hearing a lot about Chinese billionaires while there’s also a huge swath of Chinese rural poor.