![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/u9kB0kgEaN.png)
Who uses Snapchat other than little kids, and adult men who want to send dick pics to said kids?
Who uses Snapchat other than little kids, and adult men who want to send dick pics to said kids?
What part do you find suspicious? I can provide some links and screenshots.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
You start out with negative knowledge in C++, then as you just hear the name for the first time, you get your balls stepped on, jizz, and then get post-nut clarity.
Dual graphics cards worked fine already 10 years ago for me. What issue are people having?
You technically don’t have to disable these for Linux to work. It’s just that a lot of Linux drivers don’t get signed fast enough so you’d have to wait longer to get them with secure boot.
Why he disabled TPM, I don’t know. It works just fine on my device, although I don’t use it.
Fully agree. In fact, that’s what I’m suggesting in my original comment.
Web3 is essentially just indexing links. But since indexing links to pirated data is illegal, that’s why the blockchain is needed. Sure, tor is also viable, but riskier for the people hosting the websites.
You suggest IPFS, but isn’t that what web3 is?
Web3 is blockchain + IPFS and/or torrents or whatever p2p protocol.
I am not suggesting storing the data itself on the blockchain, but the index, the equivalent of simple HTML pages on the blockchain so we never lose track of the data we share with torrents or whatever peer to peer protocol.
However, if it became used in the majority for censorship resistant data sharing, and transactions were the minority, I doubt that this would stop authorities going after node operators and so on.
I doubt it would exceed transactions, but if it did, authorities would need a global agreement with every single nation to take down all nodes, and that is never happening.
The problem of curating data and deciding what is worth archiving, and what is a true-to-source archive vs fake copy. This probably requires either a centralised trusted party, or maybe a voting system
I agree with you on this, but a voting system doesn’t sound too difficult to implement. And alternatively the internet archive could be that centralized trusted party. Arresting them for reporting on what data is correct would surely be unconstitutional.
Piratebay itself was taken down. You need piratebay to distribute the magnet links.
No, but it landed the founders in jail. Are you suggesting we just accept jail as an outcome if we want to save the internet archive?
Except you can take down piratebay and send the founders to jail. You can’t take down Ethereum, or anything hosted on it.
You use IPFS for the website itself, and the blockchain to guarantee donations cannot get frozen or stolen like on patreon, and also to keep track of the files on IPFS. The latter is why you need the blockchain and no alternative work.
Think magnet links, but you can’t take down hosts who share the links like piratebay.
Yes, torrents exist, and people get fined or go to jail for seeding them, especially ebooks, movies and music, which is what the internet archive hosts.
Same would apply to yggdrasil.
But no one is going to jail for running an Ethereum node even if illegal file sharing occurs as a result of it because it is impossible to prevent it by design.
But how do we get rid of all the snakes that eat the birds that eat the spiders that eat the mosquitoes?