The connection to the network is fungible.

If the phone number you give everybody is a voip number, like Google voice…

Then it doesn’t matter who your cell phone carrier is. Buy the cheapest one, month to month.

Visible is a good option. Just don’t move your phone number. Leave your phone number on VoIP. Don’t give anybody the phone number of your phone.

A couple reasons, first it’s the easiest to move your phone around if you don’t have to move the number, second nobody can track your location by looking up your phone number if they don’t have your physical phone number. VoIP does not map to your phone

If I’m the post master I’m proud of everyone being able to communicate and the huge dividends this brings society.

I don’t get upset about delivering mail to the prisons. I would get upset if I wasn’t allowed to!

I run simplex on Android and it barely uses any battery. Just checked <1%

Yeah, if your going to support something support the open source project that doesnt advertise

Trying to figure this out

Hyperswam dht is used as the hole punch intermediary… Which is running on the hole punch swarm…https://github.com/hyperswarm

I can’t find a good overview document of how the entire architecture works, there’s no Wikipedia page on this system.

At its core, if it’s open source, I want to know what I need to run this independently on my own networks without touching any of their stuff.

Ipv6

Depending on your gateway, you may be able to override the DNS settings for a few domains that you use internally

While he did say those things, it doesn’t mean anyone was willing to fight for it internally. This is why many external companies that do so well on the open market die and wither after they get acquired by big companies. Internal politics don’t have to be rational externally.

i think it was just standard politics, everybody had to take a haircut, and nobody in leadership wanted to fight for that studio, it didn’t have a patron/protector. It got killed because no executive was championing it, not because it was bad.

Promotes/deploys are just different ways of saying file transfer, which is what we see here.

Nothing was stopping people from doing cicd in the old days.

Find a group you like to hangout with and ignore their memes. Join the discord and only do voice chat.

Watching the video.

Source First - source available - that’s what they do, good term.

I do like the discussion and the motivation illustrated

I now have a better feeling for how futo is trying to do open source capitalism

If they’re going to do this, then customers can get support via text messaging right? They’re not going to have to call in to talk to a computer to have their voice turned into text for an agent right?

This isn’t about asymmetrically wasting the time of the customer so they don’t call support at all, right?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauliflower_ear

If you really want this condition, you don’t need to inject oil, just read the The wiki article

If I’m committing to a system, I only want fans. Lowest levels of maintenance ever

Not all new cars. But some. Whenever you get a vehicle, it’s probably a good idea to buy one of those aftermarket service manuals sold to car mechanics for your make and model. Then you can verify radio repair etc etc and what circuits to take out etc

Besides if you’re trying to do information upsell, you don’t want your customer to have to go to a cell phone store and buy a SIM card and put it in the car. That’s extra friction they might change their mind. You want it to be always on and available, so they can just consent and get into the funnel

I see what you’re saying, but I don’t think there’s any universe where an advertiser will pay for traffic without any way to identify that that traffic came from an advertisement campaign

Let me use an illustrative example,

An advertiser selects middle class, obese, yet healthy minded people to receive an ad for their Fatboy Summer fitness campaign

The landing page of this campaign, is not the main site for a gym, but a Fatboy Summer specific landing page with a special offer etc etc etc all very reasonable. If you click on the link you want to find more information about their special campaign offer.

The fact that that landing page will be specific to the advertisement campaign is a given, it’s just a necessity of the transaction. Knowing these two pieces of information, you know anybody who ended up at that landing page is middle class, obese, but hopeful about getting healthy.

This is why targeted advertisements and privacy are diametrically opposed

The telemetry from your car has value, plus if they control your infotainment system they can constantly try to upsell you to subscribe or buy other features.

Not to mention when we’re talking about on a car manufacturer, they can negotiate fleet-wide data access for all the vehicles. With an agreement with the manufacturer that if the user actually buys data access for themselves, they split the profit with the carrier

That’s a really good point.

However the company that Mozilla just purchased was about targeted advertisement campaigns… “data-driven advertisements”

I’m not sure that’s true.

Advertisement campaign a, takes people to landing site b.

Anybody who shows up at site b, you know was targeted and campaign a.

And if you’re saying b is some generalized large domain, I promise you no advertiser would ever do that. They would set up subdomains, or campaign specific domains, any landing page where they know where you’re coming from. And there’s no way to stop them from doing that

At its core, most online advertising is just about a campaign to send people to a location. And if you can specify the campaign, and you can specify the location, you know which people came from that campaign and what they’re advertisement factors are

5 is the problem. If you click through to anything, the person who gets the clicks knows what campaign you came from.