Debian testing is ok for newer hardware, if you’re more technically inclined.
He / They
Software Developer
Debian testing is ok for newer hardware, if you’re more technically inclined.
People are afraid of what they do not understand. This still holds true here.
And fear leads to hate.
Thank you, I knew the rule but did not know it had a name.
Qt 3.14 came out a long time ago.
She’s gay.
It’s my first time getting name brand in a while, but it’s possible it’s like OEM tires, where the tires that come with your car don’t have as much tread as a new tire you bought yourself, even of the same model.
I actually just bought some Panasonic CR2032 and opened the packaging yesterday and I did notice they were heavier 😁
Get brand name CR2032, the cheap stuff doesn’t supply enough voltage and electronics don’t like em.
True, I didn’t structure my sentence correctly.
It gets to compete with Java and Python because it’s also JIT is what I meant to say.
Absolutely, it’s just one aspect of it, benchmarks are always narrow in scope. Some languages may be good at some things and worse at others.
Oh PHP is hands down one of the slowest languages out there. It’s just convenient because it’s easy to host, but it’s awful to use and it’s really slow.
Here, have a chart:
In this chart, where the benchmark is calculating digits of π, Java is faster than JS, but there are cases where it’s the opposite.
https://github.com/niklas-heer/speed-comparison?tab=readme-ov-file
Node.js is really not a bad backend language, since it’s JIT, it’s actually faster than Python and Java in most cases.
Rust will definitely have the advantage of being a compiled language though.
Source: I write both Java and TS backend code, have done benchmarks.
Yes please!
The Linux kernel is sponsored by many, many large companies who also contribute heavily to it. It is not lacking funds at all.
Mood, have a virtual hug
You’re not responding to the same person btw, oughta be a bit nicer :^)
I think they were just referring to the X in the name.
Gotta love circular reporting.
Correct, this two-sided discourse is due to a massive lack of communication on Mozilla’s part, leaving room for speculation.
I don’t think 201.-9 is a valid IP path 🤔
Linux: