I see, thanks, I now understand why/how their remark could be read in that way.
I feel like if people never get an outlet to showcase inaccurate ideas, they may never change them.
What you said reminds me of that fake bestseller written by a sham to make the Iraq War easier to swallow but almost all of it is inaccurate: “Honor Lost: Love and Death in Modern-Day Jordan.” Worse of all, that book is most likely detrimental to real victims of honor crimes in Jordan.
What biases? (asking seriously)
I don’t get it… you mean what OP write sounds like new atheism garbage? It could just be someone genuinely asking though, right?
Fake Qurans are hard to fool anyone with because plenty of people (me included, an atheist) memorized bits of it verbatim. People can easily cross reference anything with the thousands of online websites that offer digital Quran copies. Many have tried, and many times it eas accidental typos that urged authorities to draw back and destroy many copies with “errors”. There is also this one wacko cult leader obsessed with numerology and the number 19 who republished the Quran with some added verses. It was not taken lightly.
A global functional healthcare system, silly, not just for your local residents.
A functional healthcare system.
I eat ketchup out of a plate with a spoon.