Was it even a thing? I remember I had to choose MBR for legacy BOOT, GPT for UEFI.

Seems like a lot of supportive commenters didn’t try CSS-IN-JS like @emotion/styled, stitches, styled-components. Where are you guys? Why learning alternative names for CSS rules considered to be better, than just using those good ol’ "let you do everything what you want"s.

Buy good hardware next time

I don’t recommend GL.inet routers. I have the Marble and it is slower than my ISPs router. It has a thing called network hardware acceleration, and it breaks my home server. Services just stop working well with it. So I keep it turned off. When I reported the issue they said it is working for them and came up with a completely hypotical setup…

With AdGuard enabled it frequently froze and I had to reboot it. For some reason even without AdGuard name resolution is noticeably slower. Doesn’t matter if I use my ISP’s DNS or not.

Also, DynDNS doesn’t support custom names, so I installed an alternative service for mywire.org.

Overally, this box came with drawbacks, but no doubt about it is hackable in the good way.

I would like to try openwrt’s own router, next time.

you can remap keys with any keyboards

I use Ctrl, Alt for applications, Super for the os/windowing. I hated MacOS which mixed these things. Luckily X.org let’s you do whatever you like, sometimes it’s just harder to configure. But I like it as it is.

urxvt, bspwm, sxhkd, and many small utilities that I built my desktop with. It’s hard to reproduce the same setup.

You listed malwares. Nvidia works tho.

do they interfere?

Read thoroughly. Can’t agree more.

you can turn off notifications from starred projects

I’m not against it, but another factor that we should check in a terminal emulator (as a tool where you run everything from) is the system requirements.

I’m using urxvt and that’s so easy on the system, it starts instantly. I can open multiple instances without worrying about the system resources.

I believe it uses X.org’s text rendering. X.org uses OpenGL under the hood. It’s not CPU rendered.

Alacrity felt bulkier when I tried. I will try this too though.

From the list, openscad requires the least tutorial. Solvespace is really easy also, but you need to watch some exciting modelling videos before you get the idea around it. Blender is hard.

OpenScad also gives you a different modelling experience that lets you write reusable models, e.g. if you are a carpenter, 90% of your modelling is sizing and positioning fiberboards to shape a box. You can “automate” such tasks, easily. I wrote a script for myself that does that, and I’m now super fast at modelling furnitures. After some modelling you will be also capable of making such lib. (As a developer, I might be biased)

If you are interested in this library: https://github.com/fxdave/woodworkers-lib

Try solvespace or openscad or blender depending on your use-case.

afaik, fedora is the testing distro for RHEL. I also felt this way, when a new gnome version released much earlier than for Arch and it had an obvious bug that could be catched with little testing.

And many issues I found in Fedora’s bug tracker was auto closed by the new release. Which is quite frequent. Reviewing the bugs is not that frequent.

well, yes, but for e.g. I wrote a software piece that happened to be only a hotkey daemon. And I could write it with X. Now, hotkey daemons are no longer a separate thing unless the compositor exposes a grab API. Which never going to be in Wayland protocol, because they consider this client server architecture a problem.

There’s hope. Thanks for letting me know.

Now instead of having Wayland covering everything, applications try to cover every desktops. In the good old times, it worked everywhere.

Why does flameshot need to handle different wayland desktops separately? Because simply the protocol doesn’t do it’s job. It doesn’t cover everything. It’s indeed not ready.

I think it kills the community. Making a Wayland window manager is so much harder to do than an X one. This monolithic solution solves the problems of Gnome, and KDE developers but less people want to be involved in windowing systems. I’m just being sad for X11, because, although it had nonsense features, it made linux desktop applications compatible with every desktop and we had huge variety of wms, compositors, desktop environments. Personally I’m still on X because of bspwm, but eventually there will be wayland-only features which will slowly kill X.