I’m trying to get my first bug bounty payout and am gearing up to take a week long certification exam.

Agreed on word fence.

I didn’t say to specify a port in the DNS. I just said that it is a way that we can resolve a resource.

In the case of ports we’d configure it through whatever webserver (Apache, nginx, traefik, whatever) configs necessary on that machine. The DNS in this scenario would only be for the machines IP where our webserver then routes traffic to different ports.

I was accounting for both valid setups.

Them’s the rules.

Hey, looks, a reason to uninstall Apple News+

That’s fucking hysterical.

The balls on that guy to try to float Bitcoin as good for the environment.

He’d be better off impersonating OPEC.

That suggested, it could be done with ports, or it could be done with separate servers.

Domain.com resolves to 1.2.3.4

www.domain.com resolves to 1.2.3.4:443

app.domain.com resolves to 1.2.3.4:5555

Games.domain.com resolves to 1.2.5.6

Mail.domaim.com resolves to 1.2.7.8

Portal.domain.com resolves to 1.2.9.10

Etc, etc.

Aggregates gonna aggregate

Oh my goodness would you look at that it’s lemmy.ml again

Bye 👋

Removed by mod

thank you for telling me I should block you.

sees lemmy.ml

Sees disagreeing with a very, very simple truth

Yeah, not surprised.

Maybe in news it is. 🤷‍♂️ My knowledge comes from working with a 3rd party for ESPN. I know ESPN refers to this as the bug. There are “bug operators”, and boy howdy does the producer yell at them when they’re not on their toes.

The good guys are the citizens who want none of this.

The bad guys are the citizens who want all of this, and the military personal behind the weapons, and the generals calling the shots.

Same as it ever was.

Edit: Lemmy.ml disagreed and nobody was surprised 🙀

That’s actually called a “bug”—not the software error kind, though. In sports broadcasts, we get the classic “score bug,” always been there, usually small and tucked in a corner to keep things low-key. But what you’re seeing here, this whole bottom-of-the-screen takeover, is way more like those old-school news channel bugs from back in the ‘90s or early 2000s. You know, the ones that would stretch across the screen with stock prices, news updates, whatever they wanted to throw at you, right underneath the main action. It’s more intrusive for sure, but not anything wild—it’s actually been around for decades.

Tech is a wild ride.

Index funds are boring but *relatively stable

S&P 500 is always a good bet.

Google voice?

"at 20, you care the world what everyone thinks of you

At 40 you learn to not care what anyone thinks of you

At 60, you realize nobody has been thinking about you at all, the whole time."

Created 7 days ago.

Exited 292 years ago.

This is the creation myth.

I thought he was a party robot 🤖