![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/881dc672-1a6f-417f-a18a-84763e525b41.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/fed50129-04e7-4dbc-8f54-4ba5bae58370.png)
It’s a video game show that uses the rules of the video game world.
It’s a video game show that uses the rules of the video game world.
The release notes mention why they request each one.
Checkout https://infosec.exchange instead of blocking Threads, the admin made a second instance for people who wanted Threads blocked. Like 40 people migrated, lol
Your hyperbole makes it obvious you have no place in a reasonable debate about this topic.
I love when people conflate rights and ethics. I agree with you that no one has a right to be listed on Fedi Garden. And I still think it’s not nice to pressure admins into taking choice away from users.
“I don’t think it’s nice to federate with a company that has been cited in multiple independent reports of massacres/genocides,”
And I don’t think it’s nice to take the choice away from users. I can block threads all on my own – I don’t need a nanny who doesn’t even cite their sources.
The purpose is to learn how to publish code that cannot be used for forking as open source.
.
I have to obligate the folks to choose whether they want to pay me or help me code.
.
…it was not beneficial to me.
.
…new to gaining good visibility through open source,
Your entire comment reads as a refute of OPs criticism and an excuse for Meta’s actions. If you were agreeing with OPs criticism, you would typically use phrases like “only five years”.
And? Why take active steps to stop it from working instead of just stopping technical support? Oh yeah, to get more money.
Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.
“Monday”.length is working JavaScript and does equal 6. No print command afaik though.
Yeah. The maintainer said in their blog post they’re looking for a license that lets people read the code but not fork it. Isn’t that just standard American copyright?
Edit: Looks like they went with CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International). So not an open source license and one that CC themselves recommends not using for software.
This blog from the maintainer makes it clear they have no interest in open source other than to advertise their own skills
Appreciate you giving credit where credit is due. It is 100% corporate greed.
Thanks for your comment. I usually travel alone and was like “why would anyone subject themselves to AirBNB.” I appreciate the context and perspective.
Interesting article! I can’t tell from the post, though, is this due to a limitation on bots in Matrix or that no one has invested to make a similar bot for Matrix?
Because Sweet Baby Inc is known for forcing a narrative and tokens into the writing, for the sake of diversity on the cost of quality of the story and the characters.
Where is the proof of this beyond speculation? I can’t think of a mechanism through which a consultant can force anything. Their contracts would undoubtedly have an NDA that would prevent them from sharing which of their recommendations the client acted on or not.
Fun fact, it’s been two different groups of people in charge! Yahoo! was responsible for removing adult content and then sold it to Automattic for pennies on the dollar. Automattic then went through several rounds of different poor moderation before the CEO himself stepped up to share GDPR violating information on Twitter. Now we’re adding AI!
Dude also used a LLM to generate descriptions for the packages he’s serving from his package manager. And of course, it got them wrong, creating a headache for the actual package maintainers
2FAS is open source and doesn’t have a cloud presence to store data. You can use it to add 2FA to your other services as well.