El Barto

Oh yeah, because when I see Egyptian hieroglyphs, I think sexy beasts.

The point is not the anthropomorphism. The point is related tothe deliberate sexual undertone. And I’m not even a prude. I don’t care much about what people prefer. It’s just that the Internet broke us.

It’s like the word “cuck” (ugh.) A scholar may use it in the utmost right context, and yet, all that word does is infuriate me because of the overuse the The_Donald crowd gave to it.

it doesn’t look horny to me. She’s just woman-shaped to me.

An animal. Shaped as a fit, sexy woman. Shared on Lemmy. Yeah, not horny. Sure.

Why can’t it be horrifying and amazing?

I know, right?

When the whole AI generated art was sort of like a novelty a year ago, that’s exactly what I thought.

“Fuck. A lot of cool-looking things will be cheapened or devalued because they’ll be generated, not created.”

And sure, sure, there’s art in coming up with a nice prompt. I guess there’s art in coming up with tax exemptions too.

Wait. Isn’t this a Firefox extension that a lot of people like? Not me specifically, but I’m surprised by your comment having a lot of upvotes.

Edit: ah, it’s not upvotes, it’s downvotes lol!

Ok, sure. But this is common knowledge. Private browsing is about not leaving trace on the local machine. It was never about remaining anonymous on the internet.

I thought you were referring to the browser sending browsing history to Google somehow.

Wait… private tabs sends info to Google? How? Do you mean by clicking analytics links?

I’d be interested in this too.

“Upgrade your hardware to run the latest versions.”

As we integrate Anonym into the Mozilla family

Hoo-boy. I hope this goes well…!

Lol we’ve all been there, friend!

I think you’re taking this whole thing too seriously.

People can do whatever they want for the lulz.

Just a little push from pops at the beginning.

And they didn’t say it was a long term solution. For all we know, the drive was going to be replaced the following week.

They don’t say how much the seat was being rocked.

Maybe just a couple of inches. Enough for babby to sleep.

Did Pocket get rid of its offline reading feature? Every time I try to open one of my saved articles with no internet connection, it tells me that nope, it’s not available without a connection.

That wasn’t the case a couple of years ago.

It’s not really that bad. Start from the end to see which ones are still existing today.

But yeah, it would be nice if that last column indicated the level of popularity somehow.

Unless it’s an office?

But it still stands. Lemmy/Reddit users can be dicks.

Such a clickbaity article.

Here’s the meat of it:

Have they finally achieved consciousness and this is how they show it?!

No. The answer, as is usually the case with these things, is that we are anthropomorphizing a step too far. These models don’t care about what is and isn’t random. They don’t know what “randomness” is! They answer this question the same way they answer all the rest: by looking at their training data and repeating what was most often written after a question that looked like “pick a random number.” The more often it appears, the more often the model repeats it.

Except that they don’t think anything at all - they’re just statistics machines, and the author clarified. Clickbaity headline.

Arch and chat gpt.

Try Mint next time.