deleted by creator
deleted by creator
This is at the top of the feed now xD
Because you’re asking a court to let you not pay back a bunch of money you borrowed. Is that not reason enough? I’m not sure what you taking out another loan during bankruptcy has to do with that.
Bankruptcy should 100% be a public record.
The black piece in front is the nozzle where your drink comes out of the metal bit at the back is the thing you push your cup onto to dispense the drink
I do keep a Windows drive just in case, had to use it once for an online exam.
It’s either that or playing your PS5 in 480p
Y’all got a denial of service 0-day for Lemmy connect 👀
Damn the second image in your post didn’t load for me and it turned my Connect into an infinite grey screen
The developer specifically released the light version because they acknowledged that it is not the same and you need to make the explicit choice of what you want to keep using
Yes but the difference is one of them is also going to help you fix it.
You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.
I think I’m good 👍
Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from “opening ports”?
They’re probably just using CGNAT.
Nice 😎 Sounds like someone needs to file a complaint with the Privacy Commissioner!
Or email them to ask about it THEN complain and attach their email for extra style point!
I believe that where I live the license plate numbers would also not be considered personal information. This might work here too, if a different exemption was not claimed, although I’m not aware of anyone using this technology near me.
The server must have to send some metadata to the client telling when it’s running an ad because there are other things that need to happen client side during that like adjusting of the time or making the ad clickable
True, and they do use normal surveillance cameras too. Personally I am interested in facial recognition systems as I’ve seen the back-end of facial recognition systems in other retailers and it was incredibly creepy. They may not actually be keeping track of card #s the same way other stores do*, the biggest red flag in the statement to me is it doesn’t rule out more general demographics tracking tech, which is something I don’t think is covered by the legislation. There may be a little bit of a language barrier in this exchange as well. But I think most people aren’t very aware of even what privacy laws exist, compared to eg. the GDPR which is quite common to hear about online.
*(I want to try something similar for Mark’s since they can be seen tracking card #s in a very overt way.)
I don’t know about getting worse but it definitely has trouble in my area with some businesses/ parking lots and how to get in to them