- 11 Posts
- 55 Comments
I find it funny that the pufferfish blows up at its own gunshot
Also asexual.
Just consider most people really like sex, and some experience it as a very intense physical want to the point it makes sense that a bad version of it is better than none at all. Sort of similar to food. Better to have bad-tasting food and at least sate your hunger than to have nothing and starve.
Although, of course, it breaks down. The comments talk about actively harmful sex people wouldn’t want as well as harmful documentation; bad sex and documentation is not actually always better than no sex or no documentation. In the analogy, this would be sex that gives you an STD, or documentation that sends you running in circles and misleads you.
I’ve found a lot of understanding sex comes with just understanding a lot of people really really want it and experience it as a nigh-on need. Maybe liken it to some intense desires you have, things you need to be happy that you nonetheless don’t need to survive. (Of course, this is a generalization, I understand not all people with sexual desires have them this intensely. Some don’t need it to be happy but would sure like it a lot. And some might even get it more mildly. But for the purpose of understanding more mainstream jokes, analogies, etc. about sex…)
deleted by creator
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•You can't "skill issue" yourself out from every situationEnglish4·2 months agoI was a happy MuseScore user before and after the UI changes. So this post brings to mind questions that usually float in my mind:
- When I can happily use a thing whose UX is criticized: is it just because I don’t know any better alternatives, or because I’ve spent so long with it that of course I know how to work it? Or is the UX really not that bad? Or is it that there are often general solutions for most of the population, but sometimes some people take really well to things that work poorly for others and vice versa? Is it that the hated parts are bits I do not touch much in my workflow, so of course I see no problems because I am not interacting with the problem parts?
- When I have difficulty using a thing whose UX is praised or has no criticism: is it because I am smoothbrained? That I just have not had enough time trying to figure it out, so of course I struggle and just need to apply myself more? Is it something that works for most, but it will not work for everyone? Am I in a really niche use case with bad UX that nobody else has bothered to complain about?
I do not have enough UX knowledge to criticize or make objective evaluations here. I only have how easy it is for me to navigate applications. Though I would like to work on gaining it someday, especially so I can help out FOSS targets of “bad UX” complaints.
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Software TerminologyEnglish22·2 months agoSome people actively desire this kind of algorithm because they find it easier to find content they like this way. I’m not sure if they are immune to doomscrolling and actually have gotten it to work in a way that serves them and doesn’t involve doomscrolling, or if they are doomscrolling and okay with it. But for me, I really wish I could go back to the chronological feed era.
andioop@programming.devto New Communities@lemmy.world•Another new "Technology" community.English2·2 months agoEh, I thought different moderation philosophies were allowed, and as far as I know excluding commercial news is different from the rest given I avoid most tech communities because of all the tech-related-but-not-about-the-tech-itself articles. But my avoidance also means I have not touched every tech community, so if there is one that shares this moderation philosophy I get it.
andioop@programming.devto New Communities@lemmy.world•Another new "Technology" community.English3·2 months agoI clicked !tech@programming.dev and at least by the sidebar it seems to intend to be that, though not too active, and I had to go report an opinion piece I agree with that got tons of upvotes even though the rules say no opinion pieces.
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Which of these javascript expressions is false?English7·2 months agoIf you thought this was fun you might like https://jsisweird.com/ with similar questions
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•This gives me an ideaEnglish10·2 months agoThis is both sweet and funny. I’d love to have a spouse like that. Thanks for taking care of them :)
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Tell me the truth ...English1·2 months agodeleted by creator
https://jakec007.github.io/2020-06-28-how-we-trick-rocks-to-think/ fun, accessible-for-non-experts related article
Today we’re going to explore how the thinking rocks that power your computer are created.
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Programmers then and nowEnglish1·2 months agoAt first I thought this was the Wicked Witch of the West’s actress and thought she must have been multitalented. Then I looked it up to verify. Nope, same name, different women.
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Programmers then and nowEnglish2·2 months agoCan’t think of anything that could serve a major need right now, but I absolutely identified things in my life where I could use a preexisting tool to accomplish my goal, but it’s much less hassle for me to use the one I made for myself. You don’t have to transform the world, sometimes you can help yourself with a minor inconvenience and then put it out there for anyone who might find themselves with the same inconvenience.
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Programmers then and nowEnglish4·2 months agoTIL!
Can exit nano on my own, have the common sense to not call in a panic about it before at least looking it up. (Which is how I learned how to exit it: looking it up.) But was never taught about ^ meaning “Control+” until your comment, especially since nowadays people write it out as “Control+” or “CTRL+”.
I might have put two and two together when dealing with everything else in nano after I learned to exit, but never really internalized the rule “^ means Control+”. So thank you for your comment!
Disclaimer: I feel like I am too stupid for most of programming.dev but participate here anyways because I learn stuff from the comments.
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Programmers then and nowEnglish3·2 months agoFirst learning is last learning.
I’ll be the dumb one to ask: what do you mean? Is this that making a mistake that costs a lot is the best teacher, because you only have to mess it up once to learn it forever?
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•The future of web development is AI. Get on or get left behind.English15·2 months agoI do wonder about inventions that actually changed the world or the way people do things, and if there is a noticeable pattern that distinguishes them from inventions that came and went and got lost to history, or that did get adopted but do not have mass adoption. Hindsight is 20/20, but we live in the present and have to make our guesses about what will succeed and what will fail, and it would be nice to have better guesses.
andioop@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•The future of web development is AI. Get on or get left behind.English21·2 months agodeleted by creator
andioop@programming.devto New Communities@lemmy.world•I created a Linux community thats focused on easy customizations for every Linux distroEnglish7·3 months agoSame, I’d prefer to see this from programming.dev. Subbed anyways, because aside from changing my wallpaper I left my PC at a totally default look and would like to pressure myself to change it by following this community.
I figure this community could benefit from an ad in the many Linux communities on Lemmy.
andioop@programming.devto New Communities@lemmy.world•New community for Synology devices and softwareEnglish6·3 months agoMight be worth telling the various datahoarder communities on Lemmy
deleted by creator