Ada claims a deleted comment as evidence, because nobody can actually check a deleted comment

An admin of lemmy.ml will be able to see it in your post history, just as I can. I assume admins of other instances that it federated to will also be able to see it. Either way, this is the original URL on lemmy.ml https://lemmy.ml/post/3893219. Here is a snippet of it

You can also find a word for word duplicate of that post by the user you are claiming not to be here https://lemm.ee/post/5490949. It too has been removed, but admins will be able to see it.

You can see a snippet of it here.

I can’t click my fingers. For whatever reason it’s a skill I’ve never been able to master

Oh, I remember that!

You can smell ice?

Well, jeans are an exception. I will wear them multiple times between washes, but generally not multiple days in a row. And if it’s crotch hugging (like my jeans normally are), then I’m more inclined to wear undies. But loose pants etc, that don’t crotch hug and aren’t likely to be worn several days running, I’m less inclined to wear undies.

but I might use the same pair of pants multiple days in a row

This is something I try and avoid doing in general

If you’re leaving skidmarks on things every day, the answer to that is better cleaning, not underwear to catch the marks.

I do sometimes bleach my undies (yay vaginas), but that’s never been an issue when I’m going commando.

That would be nice, but to be fair, it’s also a bit more than “agree to disagree”

I would not teleport even if I could. I don’t want to die only to be replaced by a clone that thinks its the original me. Give me a portal I can step though, and I’ll step through it, but outright teleportation is a no from me :)

What would that look like? I’m a trans woman. When someone is standing there trying to take my rights away, and actively working to remove my access to care and support, what does “agree to disagree” look like?

Users have legislative protection of their right to be forgotten in many jurisdictions, so, yes, they should be able to. The question is more should they have the ability to take other people’s content out at the same time

For me it was a shift in perspective. It sounds trite, but basically, I turned “having fun” in to the thing I’m trying to win. So I still optimise and strategise, but sometimes it’s to make ridiculous moves that will make people laugh. Sometimes it’s to keep the game close, and sometimes it’s just to try and win. It all depends on who I’m playing with and the mood at the table

Aren’t we all using aliases (aliae?) to obscure that part of our online identity?

Never have, probably never will

I found the extra flexibility really useful. I could have an arbitrary number of words or hashtags in each antenna, rather than 4 like mastodon, which allowed me to cover all of the variations I wanted. I could use multiple words on one line for a boolean “and” function. Rare words, I would use without hashtags, common words, I would restrict to hashtags.

I could follow instances, I could follow people, I could follow keywords, and I could follow regular words, with more control than basic hashtags.

Antenna used to work differently, but were changed to be less performance intensive (and less useful) somewhere after the rebrand to Firefish.

Before the change, they were the single best feature of Firefish IMO

I never read that series, but you’ve got me keen to give it a try now :)

Telltales Walking Dead had a similar impact on me and for similar reasons

Closed loop time travel. Where the results of someone travelling back in time are already there for us to see, even before we get to the point where they jump back.

I don’t know about rule 1, but it’s off topic for this community, which could explain it

But unless it’s free, the majority of people wouldn’t be able to afford it anyway. Remember most people live week to week with no savings buffer.