• 1 Post
  • 74 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle



  • Finally, a question where i can shine. You don’t have to do anything specific. Just do things.

    Use a headset with your phone or laptop: You are on a call. Most people don’t speak much at online meetings.

    Take a little nap? Thinking.

    Want some time alone? Go to a meeting room. Works even better if the room has glass walls since you can see them and they can see that you are “busy”, but no one sees your screen.

    Have multiple monitors. There’s always something work-related on at least one screen.

    Have fields of interest that blend in. If one of your hobbies is vaguely related to work you are golden. You can totally read something unrelated to work during working time if it seems most your attention goes towards work. (See multiple screens and some switching back and force.)

    Shift your working hours slightly from the norm, i.e. come 5 min earlier than others.

    Don’t hide windows with non-work stuff when someone sees them. Too late. Act as if you have nothing to hide.

    Do a reasonable work-life blend. Work overtime occasionally at odd hours and make managers know that you solved an emergency in your free time. Gives you an excuse to leave early or slack off the next day and any other day.

    React to emails with a resonable delay. Of course, you can help, but not right now. You are busy.

    Block your calendar and decline invites.










  • I’ve been macOS user for past decade.

    I find macOS UI superior to both Gnome and KDE.

    I’m not surprised.

    Also, I’m not sure if Gnome tries to mimic OS X or Windows or KDE, for the sake of this argument. Gnome (classic) was invented to replace (original) KDE, which sort-of tried to replace Windows.

    Stuff evolves. UIs oscillate between minimalism and overload.





  • Most specialized software are web apps running in a browser hosted on the cloud these days. I’m sure they exist, but I couldn’t name any HR, ERM, CRM, … software that’s not a web app.

    The desktop OS is becoming irrelevant. That’s why those who want a Mac or Linux notebook can make it work, at least from a purely technical point of view; i.e. if the company allows it. That’s also, why there will never be a year of the Linux desktop. (I mention Macs here, because while OS X gets some commercial software that you won’t get on Linux, it’s not that much outside of some niches)

    There will never be a year of the Linux desktop because you gain very little from replacing Edge on Windows with Firefox on Linux (a different software that does the same thing). However, you loose some specialised software and your IT supplier, your IT service provider, half of your IT staff and some of your non-IT employees’ skills. This does not sound like a good business case.

    Linux on the desktop never happened, because Linux on the server replaced desktop applications.


  • I don’t know if it is fair to call it a disaster. I don’t know enough from the inside, but I believe in retrospect the goal was maybe to ambitious or plain wrong.

    They were attempting to port huge amounts of decades old Office macros to OpenOffice. That failed, but before the LiMux project they had already failed to migrate the same to a modern version of MS Office.

    The goal for LiMux was to be a better Windows than the best Windows Microsoft would offer at the time. Literally impossible.

    That combined with strong lobbying and users confused with a different UI and probably a lot of small day-to-day issues (which happens with any software, but can make an IT department look bad) made it politically hard to sustain an ‘experiment’.

    The current IT lead of Munich, hired after migrating back to Microsoft, does not seem to be a Microsoft fan.