Pissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D

Lisp code is already like this. That’s why I keep trying to explain it to programmers. Try reading the book SICP, published decades ago by MIT computer researchers.

https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=a3t3IKlXqFU

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Then you clearly don’t care about understanding anything computer-related. That’s fine, but not my problem.

I think they will, but you’re free to disagree.

Look up a bit about Nikola Tesla as well.

Yes, but we can try to wait for a world like futurama. That’s what I’m doing right now.

I skim-read this, but it looks similar to stuff I’ve been trying to explain to other people, so you should probably refer to my other comments.

Any further questions can be clarified later.

I can attempt to explain anything I think I understand at any level I understand it, and I’m being totally serious most of the time.

I like jokes though, too.

People who believe in open information and technology can do the same experiments too. They’ll just be at different steps.

Tesla already solved a lot of this on his own.

I’m talking about things clever people are attempting right now in labs and might do eventually.

Yes, but advanced physics systems like string theory have been building up logic systems for a long time.

These logic systems can solve problems statistically.

The main problem with current solar fusion systems in labs is that a greater proportion of energy is lost than gained. And yes, scientists can gain energy using tiny amounts of matter.

E=mc^2

What isn’t how what works? Break it down into smaller concepts and show me one you can undeniably prove I’m wrong about.

Yes. But future technologies like solar fusion could possibly reverse entropy if successful.