• 3 Posts
  • 641 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle

  • As to why I dont mind the fee as a consumer; valve invests its earnings into linux gaming and does cool shit like that.

    You’re also talking like they wouldn’t have as many customers if they reduced their cut which is completely ridiculous. More profit would go to the people actually doing the work or prices would go down.

    Stop defending the billionaire, you’re making a fool of yourself.





  • Again, they can afford their R&D while paying their employees more than the industry average and while making the owner a multibillionaire, they 100% could afford to lower their cut without any negative impact on everyone but Gabe Newell.

    The lower % starts if a game sells enough copies to make 10m$, Valve has made 3m$ at that point.

    Stop defending the people that make you poorer, they’re not your friends, all billionaires exist at the expense of our wealth. All. Of. Them. Are. Evil.



  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.workstoGames@lemmy.worldUbisoft comes crawlin' back to Steam
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ve had this conversation so many times and some people just can’t imagine that they might be paying more than they need to just so Gabe can collect yachts… People feel they’re getting their money’s worth because everything they’ve ever bought is priced based on the fact that there’s multimillionaires and billionaires higher up the chain…










  • From the get go, you’re wrong

    https://www.coindesk.com/learn/bitcoin-mining-difficulty-everything-you-need-to-know/

    The more people mine, the more decentralized it is, the more energy is necessary because difficulty is increased. The more transactions happen, the more blocks are required, the more energy needs to be spent to confirm all the transactions. The more it’s used, the higher the value, the more people mine.

    There’s a limit to the number of transactions per block as well, so no, your can’t just say “1 or 1000 it’s the same”.

    Visa is already able to handle 24000 transactions per second as is, no need for more infrastructure.

    Crypto uses 1% of the world’s energy production for a couple trillions in assets, the financial system uses 2.5% for quadrillions in assets, multiple thousands more than crypto, no, crypto can’t scale to that without a huge environmental impact.

    Yes you are trying to greenwash crypto, just stop.


  • I’ve had to fuck around with my Windows saves (backed to the cloud) when installing the Linux version of Wasteland 2 and the two Pillars of Eternity games and I eventually just gave up and installed them with Proton so it would download the saves to the right place for them to work.

    If you play Deadfire on multiple Linux devices you need to install with Proton compatibility otherwise cloud saves don’t work at all because Steam doesn’t back up the right folder (it uses the Windows folder name which has a lower case o in the word Of), that means that if you wipe your hard drive and rely on cloud saves then you’re fucked because Steam will have created an empty folder to backup.

    And remember, as I said, the Deck installs the Windows version by default but if you have Linux on your PC then chances are cloud saves between your Deck and PC won’t work unless you force the Deck to install the Linux version of games.


  • Visa can process a maximum of 24k TPS

    Crypto energy usage goes up the more it’s being used and the more decentralized it becomes. Centralized services like Visa can increase the network load while barely increasing the energy requirements.

    Crypto bros always forget that to replace the banking system, crypto would need to replace the infrastructure as well, but because of decentralization it would be less energy efficient for the same result.

    You can just stop, there’s no way to greenwash crypto and decentralization. The amount of transactions happening on all crypto networks at the moment could be handled by one server if it was centralized. There’s benefits to it, stop trying to sell it as being green, it’s not and never will be.