Infiltrated_ad8271

deleted by creator

TRY ARCH

PS: Just a meme to joke, if you want to analyze, please don’t point at me.

Where did you see that? Are you sure you are not confusing it with fedora gnome?

Your attitude and constant insults are much worse.

fighting social injustices

There you have given yourself away as a troll.

For whatever reason, they are not visible from kbin.

After they post-retire your enemies, they will send you the confirmation images censored with GIMP.

They have no problem in the xorg vs wayland war, they arbitrarily reject both.

Unfortunately doing so anonymously is not an option for many countries.

It can probably be done with any video player, but it may be necessary to duplicate it and change the file extension.

NOPE. Every time I do it, I have to give them a lot of help and I end up becoming their technical support staff; my quota is already full, I’ve done my part.

https://idm.net.au/blog/002646two-years-european-isp%E2%80%99s-data

I think this is a shitpost of the highest order. If this appears to everyone (?) it adds nothing, and the crappy table is just astonishingly blatant cherry-picking.

It’s quite sad to see reasonably popular apps with virtually no funding. I feel like highlighting the case of rssguard, probably one of the most popular apps in its category, with patreon, liberapay, and offering to prioritize bugs and suggestions from donors… barely 5€ per month.

Oh, I almost forgot, in these topics there should be a mandatory mention of core-js case.

Not that I know of. But you may be interested that it requires prior authorization to modify manifests.

For security reasons the packaging of flatpaks in flathub is done by flathub, whether they are devs or third parties they just write the manifest. Although I seem to remember there are some exceptions, such as firefox.

Okay, now I see which article you are referring to.
I know knowledge-zero, but we have different points, mine was not about the inability to do it but how the government will do it.

It would be very easy for them to justify that they have to identify pedos, I would be very surprised if they would guarantee privacy. But whatever, unfortunately I guess we’ll find out.

I read the article and did not see where the method is specified, have you even read it?

When implemented correctly

Aha. How bold to assume that they will limit themselves and apply privacy best practices.

But that refers to personal data, and I suppose the state will be able to identify you and your habits if it gets the logs from the websites.
I wonder if the websites will get a unique identifier, that would allow them to track you so accurately it would make google horny.

Expect parents to be minimally responsible? No way!