It’s not a computer playing, a person plans out the run and then executes the plan with the help of slow motion, save states, and frame-by-frame play. Seeing things that no human could possibly pull off unassisted is entertaining too.
It feels like all SAI models are poisoned in some way. I wonder what’s wrong with this one?
I’m about to install it too. I just switched to SwarmUI.
I was using this for a while on A1111. It seems to have a way to use it as a standalone executable.
Same. My A1111 started having problems I couldn’t deal with anymore, so I gave it a shot. I just miss my plugins.
I have a feeling this experiment would sooner get the axe than have ads injected. There was initially a waiting list, but just a few days in it was completely open to the public.
Sometimes they just do research. Like when their employees made transformers and nothing came of them until Open AI capitalized on it.
There are ads in them now? I didn’t encounter any when using it a few days ago.
I just generated one and didn’t hear any ads.
As long as your AI doesn’t somehow infringe on your training data, you’re allowed to use whatever you want, just like reviewers, analysts, and indexers do.
We can’t have shit under capitalism. The only rights Nintendo recognizes is your right to give them money.
It’s not looking good.
They’re trained on technical material too.
It’s only decipherable to people who have kept up with the last two years of IMG Gen jargon.
I found this guide on how to make an inpainting model out of any model. Though it’s pretty out of date.
Yeah, this seems like the last confirmation we didn’t really need.
What are his feelings on open source? That’s my question.
If you’re using the same UI and metadata, you should be able to reproduce images with only slight differences and then upscale them with hires fix or something else.
Fair use isn’t a loophole, it is copyright law.