I do /volumX for additional hard drives.

For most network share I use /mnt/$server.

Love it!!

It is not 1000 it 10000.

You can try with setting g+w on pve.

I can’t say I share that experience. By biggest problem with player is lake of chromecast on IOS and half balled chromecast on Android (lake of volume level, default 10% volum, doesn’t see my speaker pair, doesn’t always discover chromecast devices).

I have not heard of Prologue and it support for Audiobookshelf (ABS).

Why would one choice Prologue over the ABS app?

Test out Play Sync for Lemmy works great.

I love masonry view. This is the first web app I have see, that is closers to Sync for Lemmy.

Thank you.

Draw us a topology drawing. Please.

Agreed the PCI layout is bad. My problem is the x16 slot.

I would prefer 8 slots/onboard with PCIe5 x2 from CPU. From the chipset 2 slots of PCIe4 x2. This would probably adequate IO. Aiming for 2x25 Gbits performance.

Depending on the price I would like to use to replace my Synology, I will strip os and run standard Debian.

Sadly is very hard to repurpose an Synology.

It can show Markdown and have preview of markdown.

It have highlighting of Markdown, but is not editor similar to Sync for lemmy.

Privat gitea server.

Yes there is TPM for full disk encryption.

https://gist.github.com/orhun/02102b3af3acfdaf9a5a2164bea7c3d6#using-tpm-20

Do I had problem making swap partition work. As lockdown mode is triggered.

https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/kernel_lockdown.7.html

I current only encrypted home.

Vaultwarden is a lightweight server of bitwarden.

Alternative implementation of the Bitwarden server API written in Rust and compatible with upstream Bitwarden clients*, perfect for self-hosted deployment where running the official resource-heavy service might not be ideal.

GitHub vaultwarden

Server side is more complex. So for serverside you will be hard to find non docker og non manual installasion.

Bitwarden have deb and rpm support.

BTRFS is currently not Journaling

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220513113826.GV18596@twin.jikos.cz/T/#m46f1e018485e6cb2ed42602defee5963ed8c2789

Qu Wenruo did a write up on some of the edge cases. Partial write being one of them.

I run BTRFS my self.

And I agree BTRFS , is superior.

Yes both BTRFS and Ext4 are vulnerable to unplanned powerloss when writes are in flight. Commonly knows as a write hole.

For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.

This will also happen to Ext4. You just wouldn’t know it.