• mogranja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The company I used to work at paid for me to get two certifications on Dynamics. Once I left there and got another job, I didn’t put th3 certifications on my CV so I wouldn’t be called to work with this.

  • Yaky@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I see Microsoft Dynamics 365 and would like to introduce you its little brother: Microsoft Dynamics NAV. The language is C/AL, offshoot of Pascal, code editor does not support multi-line selection (let alone any features like highlighting or navigation), and source code control is managed by locking files.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I literally came to the comments to say how happy I was that it wasn’t another meme about Teams

  • Ethan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    There was this one time where I took down the accounting department by accidentally DDOSing the SQL server. MS Dynamics is such a piece of garbage that it will crash if the database takes more than a minute to respond.

  • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    is it really that bad compared to other things on the market? I did some Salesforce and some hubspot stuff and I wanted to off myself with those too lmao

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a software suite for managing company finances, but can do way, way more if you keep slapping bullshit on it. You can run a retail operation through it, for example.

      It’s a big, irritating “do anything financial for any type of business” app, and like most “all in one” tools is horribly over and under designed.

      Working with it is brittle, stupid, complicated and expensive.

      • Inktvip@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve seen a factory being shoehorned into using it. Maintenance planning and all.

        Needless to say that its not working out well.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Having worked with both, SAP if by far the worst of the two.

          But Sage is another league. Want an API? Sure, here you go. Oh, you want it to do something usefull? I’m afraid we can’t do that.
          It’s so bad their client ask actual third parties to create custom APIs to be able to actualy do something.
          If you are lucky you’ll have a good third party, if your’re not you’ll be like me, trying to do something without any docs, and api datapoints that make no sense unless you have said missing docs.
          Those fuckers can’t even chose what format to give to their id. Sometimes it is a string with a lenght of 7, sometime 13, sometimes an int.

          • PolarKraken@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sounds much like PowerBI, which I can’t say I’ve used much directly. But every time we use it, because the client likes the idea and it can theoretically do “all the business intelligence” natively…we eventually find it can only do 80% of what they actually want, which completely removes its single advantage and forces us to go custom anyway. We’ve stopped offering it, to be clear.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Drastically different products. Its basically a full ERP with a full CRM build in. It massively outsizes Access, a DB/DBMS, in both complexity and abject stupidity.

          • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Access is also a full “cms” for constructing program interfaces, ui.
            I have seen fully fledged programs written in it, and it wasn’t pretty.

            Dynamics sounds like it is “excel/sql with data analysis strapped on”, where access was “excel/sql with frontpage strapped on”

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The scale is different. Dynamics is mainly an ERP like Sage or SAP. It’s something you could coordinate the movement of millions of goods through, and tens of thousands of people.

              Access is a database with a GUI that you can slap more GUIs onto at your own peril. Dynamics is an iteration of " Microsoft Great plains" that was turned into an unholy monstrosity to compete with Oracle/IBM, etc

              You will spend millions of dollars deploying it. It will both be bewildering too much and not enough.

  • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have to use this at work, so yeah.

    The really scary part is, I have gotten used to it and now it doesn’t feel so bad anymore.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      As someone who escaped from that hell, I pity you.

      Then I remember that I’ve now experienced far worst, and Dynamics seem not that vad in retrospect.