• graycube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    28 days ago

    I was in a computer store a few years ago watching a young guy trying to sell a tablet to an older woman. He said “the good news about this is that it can’t get viruses because it runs apps”.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      28 days ago

      If you assume that she will only install official apps, that they are sandboxed and Apple doesn’t allow viruses in App Store apps, then that statement seems fine to me.

      Every networked computer has some risk of getting a viris of course.

      • renzev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I mean yeah like you can be a pedant about it but all in all its a statement that makes sense. Apps on both android and ios are very sandboxed, even if you go out of your way to install malware there’s very limited damage it can do, barring zerodays in the sandboxing itself.

    • TheV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Tztztz…didn’t he know that a full virus protection is only achieved when you run apps that run ads?

  • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    28 days ago

    The top bit got me recently, I hadn’t needed to remote into my desktop in a while and searched “Remote” and “RDP” and found nothing. Eventually I found it was renamed to the windows app and finally logged in but was baffled as to why they would do that.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      28 days ago

      This is the dumbest rebranding ever. If I tried really hard to make it as dumb as possible, I’d still not be able to come up with such a horrendously bad idea.

      • ooo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        28 days ago

        Even if they renamed it to “Now You Too Can Have Magical Long Fingers and Vision” it would be somewhat descriptive of what it does.

      • Pothetato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        28 days ago

        Like how many people were involved in this decision? Let’s just call it “computer program”.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        Worse than Twitter to X? At least windows app is loosely related to the original overall branding

          • jqubed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            internet.website is available to register but I checked a couple registrars and they all seem to have it as a premium domain that costs several thousand to register.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      28 days ago

      I use Remote Desktop it a lot, and was warned about the changing name beforehand. And yet when one day the old application disappeared from my dock, I had the same reaction. I thought company IT or a macOS update might’ve screwed me over.

      I’m used to it now, but that was a strange day.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      From what I read Windows App does not support RDP and you need to use Remote Desktop Connection (not Remote Desktop App, which is a different thing)

      https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/windows-itpro-blog/windows-app-to-replace-remote-desktop-app-for-windows/4390893

      Remote desktop users: Users connecting to remote desktops from the Remote Desktop app should use Remote Desktop Connection until support for this connection type is available in Windows App.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          28 days ago

          Well, and there’s also just lots of webpages implemented as an SPA – Single-Page Application.
          Which you might be able to register in your browser as a PWA – Progressive Web App.
          And which are just generally equally as interactive as an app, so good luck explaining the difference to folks who don’t care about implementation specifics…

  • kaeurenne@lemmy.kadaikupi.site
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    28 days ago

    I am questioning whether it’s true that Microsoft is attempting to implement more brand-based marketing, ecosystem lock-in, and a walled garden by rebranding Remote Desktop as a Windows App. Yes, I agree that everything now uses “app” in computer terminology; at least, it seems so. What if one day even the OS kernel is called an app too? Lol

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    28 days ago

    Not sure if this fits this comm, but I hate that the act of buying a phone plan and inseting a sim card is now referred to as “activation”.

    “Activation” is the iPhone forced internet-setup thing, not the fact that you use wifi-only instead of cellular. 🤦‍♂️

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        Perhaps it isn’t exactly a new term, but I hate that term regardless. A smartphone can do many things without a cellular connection, a cell plan is not an “activation” but a feature upgrade.

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          You’re not even right. You are genuinely activating the SIM card and anyone around you paraphrasing to “activating a phone” is also correct, because nobody cares what other meaning you personally wish to ascribe to the task.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      You understand that SIM cards aren’t actually active until they’re connected to the network for the first time, right?

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Why are you buying a phone plan if you’re not using the mobile network?

          • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            I know one person who does this. It’s simple: apple discontinued the ipod touch. He had no other choice than to get an iphone without a sim

          • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            28 days ago

            No, I mean the context is, when you buy a phone from Best Buy, the sales person uses deceptive language to frame it as if your phone will not function unless you purchase a plan by asking “Would you like to activate your phone right now”, implying its locked and can’t even be used for Google Voice/VOIP calls, and as a multi-function tool (GPS, Camera, Notes, E-Reader, Audio Recorder, etc…).

            Deceptive Corporatist language.

            • kungen@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              28 days ago

              Aha, okay, much clearer what you meant now. Yeah, they surely get a kickback for each new subscription.