I know it’s called plasma, and I don’t know if it’s actually plasmas fault, don’t judge me, it’s for the meme

  • Wofls@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    AUR waterfox-bin, btw (¬‿¬") I’m almost glad to have made the mistake to install Arch because through AUR I don’t have to get involved in these flatpack/snap/appimage wars xD (also because I have no clue what I am doing, but don’t tell anyone)

    • floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      ahah lol that’s fair, i maintain the flatpak so whenever i see someone with Waterfox on Linux I get curious. Love the AUR but I’m mostly on immutable distros so I don’t get to use it qwq

      • Wofls@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I actually used the flatpak on my mint install a while ago, had no problems. So great work for a great browser I’d say xD thanks o7

        • floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          lol thanks, it’s more of a side project atm as I’m juggling school and running IT for my dad’s business but I’m glad to hear it worked for you!

      • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Distrobox says hi! I used the AUR occasionally when I was on Silverblue and there weren’t any alternatives short of compiling the software myself. Or rarely if I needed a newer version of something.

      • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is unrelated but what’s the appeal toward immutable distros to you?

        I don’t mean this in a hostile way I’m genuinely curious to know. I usually consider the ability to change anything about Linux as quite a big selling point so these distros seem kinda counterproductive to me.

        • IverCoder@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I usually consider the ability to change anything about Linux as quite a big selling point so these distros seem kinda counterproductive to me.

          Immutable distros are actually easier to customize and tinker with than traditional distros, while being safer. Example: Universal Blue

        • floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Basically what IverCoder said, but also sometimes I like not having to tinker with my desktop at all. I’m running through an Arch Install on my Thinkpad right now just for the fun of it and I do love this kind of thing, but I’ll admit the concept of plugging in a USB stick, installing a distro in one click, downloading my apps through Flatpak and not having to mess with the CLI a whole bunch is very appealing. Yes you can do that with Ubuntu or whatever but (at least in my workflow) you still have to mess with the CLI a bit.

          Basically, I like messing with Linux sometimes but other times I just want a, I suppose Windows-like experience while still having Linux under the hood.