Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Apps@lemmy.world · 3 months agoMlmym (also known as old.lemmy) isn't maintained anymore, and features are starting to become unusable as instances are migrating to newer versions. Would someone be interested in forking the project?lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageMlmym (also known as old.lemmy) isn't maintained anymore, and features are starting to become unusable as instances are migrating to newer versions. Would someone be interested in forking the project?lemmy.dbzer0.comBlaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Apps@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square15linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareseeigel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·3 months agoIt’s open source. If somebody wants to fix v3, they could submit patches. It’s unfortunate that v3 is stalling but nobody is paying the devs so they can prioritize however they see fit. I also think that right now developing missing features is more important than old APIs.
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoFeatures can be developed independently of the API and/or added without introducing breaking changes.
It’s open source. If somebody wants to fix v3, they could submit patches.
It’s unfortunate that v3 is stalling but nobody is paying the devs so they can prioritize however they see fit.
I also think that right now developing missing features is more important than old APIs.
Features can be developed independently of the API and/or added without introducing breaking changes.