From today until March 15, 2026, the maximum lifetime for a TLS certificate is 398 days.

As of March 15, 2026, the maximum lifetime for a TLS certificate will be 200 days.

As of March 15, 2027, the maximum lifetime for a TLS certificate will be 100 days.

As of March 15, 2029, the maximum lifetime for a TLS certificate will be 47 days.

What’s everyone’s opinion on this? I think from a security standpoint their reasoning is valid and in many cases it’s very easy to automate the renewal with ACME or something else. But there’s likely gonna be legacy stuff still around in 2029 that won’t be easy to automate.

      • SecureTaco@lemmy.asc6.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Self signed certs still have to abide. It’s the browser that checks it not the issuer. Now granted in most cases you already get a non trusted warning that most sysadmins skip…

        • Zeoic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The cert is what tells the browser how long it lasts, so I’m not sure how the browser can stop you from using a 10 year self signed cert or one from your own CA

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            If the browser sees it expires too far in the future, it could throw a warning or error.

            I doubt any of them will actually do it, but it’s possible.

            • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              Most browsers do this for certs with a lifetime longer than 398 days issued after 2020, which is one aspect of why so many websites use a 1 year validity period for their certs.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Self signed certs still support longer time frames

      If you need to expose a legacy system to the internet we have bigger issues

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Are compromised private keys that much of a problem in the real world to merit such a pain in the ass, heavy handed “solution”? On paper, sure, it makes sense. In practice, you’re forcing people to complicate the process by introducing, until now, unnecessary automation and introducing the possibility of brand new points of vulnerability.

    I say this as someone who does maintain legacy systems (i.e. systems), so take it with a very angry, frazzled grain of salt. But I’ve done this for years decades and many, many systems and to my knowledge, I’ve never had a compromised private key.

    This just seems like people who constantly lose their house keys mandating that everyone else change their locks as often as they do.

  • nazgul666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If I understand this correctly, it only affects certificates issued by public CAs (certificates for public websites, for example). So for certs issued by a company CA (e.g. for internal infrastructure), it should not apply. Can anyone confirm?

    • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The browser warning appears even for a cert issued by a non public CA you have told your browser to trust, and most browsers already enforce a 398 day limit, so unless you have cooperative users, you’re already (effectively) capped at 1 year of validity.

  • Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My little corner of the business has started migrating our certs to let’s encrypt.

    Hope it catches on else where

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am a little concerned about the fact that Let’s encrypt is a centralized service subject to outages. What would happen if they we either breached or had a several day issue.

      If you are in the cloud you can use the cloud provided certs

      • Z3k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is always a concern however we were recently stung by the dicicert revocation thing. Spending a night changing thousands of certs was not fun

  • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doesn’t really affet me much, as my LE cronjob will update the cert either way. Doesn’t really matter if it’s 90 days or 47 (what a weird number of days)

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I only can assume: 1.5 months rounded up, using 31 days a month 31+16=47

      So you get half a month to realize that your monthly automated renewal is broken?