• Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Steam is not free. Steam is 30% cut to businesses.

      Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft offload their costs via yearly subscription costs as well as developers paying a protection fee to launch on their platform. Steam just has the highest protection money scheme. You wouldn’t want anything to happen to the games you’re publishing through them, would you?

  • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    One of the issues I have with the new open-world style Zelda games is that they don’t have replay value. After finishing each once (which takes a lot of time), I can’t actually imagine wanting to go back and play them again. So yeah, Nintendo can charge what they want and it isn’t very appealing regardless. Increased resolution isn’t going to change the experience.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    better framerates, higher resolutions, and HDR support

    Interestingly you can get all that for free now. Yarr

  • vegetvs@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My ol’ good Switch 1 will keep rocking my TV set until it breaks apart. I never asked for a Switch 2 anyway.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    IDK how to feel about rising video game prices. On the one hand, prices were stagnant for decades. On the other hand, companies can sell far more copies of games than they could back in the 1980s and 1990s. The cost of games is all in the development. The more you sell, the cheaper the price can be. They cost next to nothing to package and distribute (or are distributed digitally.)

    On one hand, games are a lot more complex and expansive than they were back in the day. On the other, game devs now have tools the creators of old couldn’t even dream of. No one is hand coding the next Mario game is assembly.

    There’s a lot of variables here. And it’s really just hard to make a fair judgment about it.

    • nuko147@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah but BOTW has already made them rich. Development is finished and even the next game is 2 years old. I call it pure greed.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If they’re turning billions of dollars in profit each year, there’s no reason to raise the price. Fuck them

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They cost next to nothing to package and distribute (or are distributed digitally.)

      Steam takes 30% cut. This, of course, does not apply to nintendo, but still

  • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Title is a bit misleading

    There are a few scenarios here.

    1. You own the game on switch and already have the dlc so pay nothing unless you want to pay $10 or have the switch online subscription for the switch 2 edition if you want the enhancements. For a total of $0-10 depending on your choice

    2. You own the game but dont have the dlc so pay $20 for that and then $10 for the switch 2 version unless you have the subscription for a total of $20-30 depending on your choice.

    3. You dont own the game so you buy the switch 2 version for $70 and the dlc for $20 for a total of $90.

    This is not the same as the $90 game lie thats being told, but it is painted that way. To get clicks.

    Paying $70 for a game and then paying more for an expansion is nothing even close to new. For example, Destiny 2 is free but if you want the DLC its gonna cost you between $150 and $270 depending on when you buy it as there are sometimes deals on.

    • Breath of the Wild is 8 years old at this point. Asking $70 for that is pretty egregious in my opinion. Maybe for TotK that’d be more acceptable but for BotW I think it’s a very steep price. Especially given that it’s common that rereleases usually include dlcs by default.

      I’d expected $60 for the full package, not $90, given that the amount of development work was likely pretty low (the game was finished years ago after all). So 50% higher than expected.

      The SM64+Sunshine+Galaxy bundle game was $30, for comparison. That’s three full games that they needed to put in effort for to run on the Switch.