• megabucks@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That video you shared was great!

    I agree that neutering an artist’s vision is almost always a mistake, but I wonder if the artist’s vision has changed with the times as well? Furthermore, with patches, updates, downloadable content, and expansion packs for games, at what point is a game, as a work of art, complete?

    How do you even begin to preserve a work of art when it is constantly changing and evolving?

      • megabucks@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I went off on a weird tangent about game preservation after my initial question, but that’s what I meant with my “I wonder if the artist’s vision has changed as well.”

        If the artist’s views have changed, and they are either supportive or the driver of a change like this, is it neutering their vision? It’s certainly straying from the original vision, but I wouldn’t call it neutering.

        When I think of neutering, or really, betraying an artist’s original vision, I think of something more akin to Terminator 2 (James Cameron was pushed to give the movie an open-ended ending), or, more recently, 2003’s Dumb & Dumberer.

        • Senicar@social.cyb3r.dog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One character is explicitly underage and sexually assaulted in game. Another is the “she died young and is a ghost so she just LOOKS young but she’s actually way older” trope.