Should we allow one, both, or none?
You must log in or register to comment.
None.
Racism, as we all (should) know is skin shallow. That is enough. Not being of the “right” color establishes that an individual has no rights, no freedoms, and in extremes cases, not even humanity.
Classism is just a reviewed version of the cast system. Where you are born on the social pyramid dictates your fate. Born poor, die poor.
None are tolerable. All human beings are born equal.
Are people not racist based on accent as well though?
For example Irish people?
I’m not directly conected with english speaking countries so that example always evades me but you’re right.
The scottish also had it bad with the english as well. And some time back I read a news report on how a man had been insulted in a train for not speaking english, in London. He was speaking welsh…
Racism picks on any small thing to rise divergence, usually something the target of it can’t change. But anything works.
I wasn’t saying you were wrong, I was just wondering if I was. True about the Scot’s, and the Welsh too….and the Cornish. Basically any form of Celt.
We’re just exchanging ideas here and you brought up a very good point.
But it made think that by contrast, in Africa, several ethnic groups coexist and language was not that big of a concern for conflict.
well at least there’s one sane person on this website.
It wildly depends on who you ask, so don’t waste your praise on me.
deleted by creator
How high are you right meow?
i dont get high anymore.
Not very, it is mostly downvoted so won’t appear very high in most people’s feeds
deleted by creator
One is based on something you can’t control.
so if your born in a rich family. is that in your control?
No, but at the same time, wealth doesn’t need to be made out by someone as being a matter of class, just a manifestation of what you’ve been able to give/receive in society.
I know a guy earning six figures that considers himself working class because “I work”, we all know he’s comfortably middle upper.
I don’t judge him based upon his wealth but that doesn’t mean class isn’t a thing.
So would it be fair to say if someone was a higher status than you, there should be no ill will against them? only the select few who exploit those below them?
It’s always fair to say people should only be judged by their character.
Is it fair to hate slavers? Or is it only fair if they are actively enslaving people? /s
At this point, it’s obvious you’re a bad faith actor here (and an incompetent one at that), but on the miniscule chance you aren’t:
It is as impossible to be a good person, and be a slaver as it is to be a billionaire and a good person.
Both of those require active exploitation of people. You’re just used to framing the exploitation in terms that don’t make the exploitation clear for billionaires.
whats the difference between a slave and you?
I don’t exploit people to live.
That’s the point.
so people who are a class higher than you exploit you? is that how the system works?
Racism is ignorance and can be mended with understanding. Classism is an ongoing war, and can be mended with (upward) mobility, strikes or even riots/civil disobedience.
who are you committing war on?
The exploitation-class is in a class war against the rest of the world. You didn’t notice?
who is exploiting you day to day?
I have to ask, are you trying to be obtuse? I can’t tell if you’re aware of what class war is but pretending not to, or if you are just looking to kick start a bad faith argument?
I’m hoping they’re trying to make some point but it’s so poorly written we don’t get it…
But I think it’s blindingly obvious you’re right.
https://lemmy.world/c/workingclasscalendar is a good place to start.
Hummm… Maybe I could find some videos showing some class warfare. Let me see… Found some tangential ones.
The Reason You’re Poor (It’s more than just taxes)
Welfare: For them, but not for you!(How YOU Subsidize Everything)
America’s Unemployment Problem
Landlord arguments suck (Debunking Arguments Landlords Use to Justify Their Existence)
This is what could find in a short period of time. Hope it helps? You should defensively read up on class struggle.
The difference?
Its right there in the names
That makes no sense. if its wrong to be racist then its wrong to be classist.
OK, boomer.
ok doomer
Racism is an extreme form of Classism which is caste-based.
Social class distinctions can vary by time and place and has been an issue among humans at least since the advent of agriculture. Social class may be determined by wealth, pedigree, politics, appearance, language, and likely hundreds of other variables depending on the social constructs of the given society.
Racism is derived from 17th-century European pseudoscience which proposed that there are “races” of humans which determine their intelligence, values, and appearance. According to the philosophy of racism which has been completely debunked as science for over a century, “White” people, the dominant caste, do not have inherent racialized characteristics while all other racialized groups (which are different over place and time) are born with certain characteristics that may or may not be tolerated depending on how liberal the racist is. I can’t describe here the rules of why a person may be labeled a given race because it’s as complicated as the entire field of sociology and unique to time and place.
Personally, I don’t think any kind of classism is legitimate. That being said the majority of people throughout the world believe that at least some forms of classism are legitimate so it’s not a question of allowing it, rather choosing how to deal with people who may discriminate against you for arbitrary and typically non-sensical reasons.
