It is battle tested, standardized, widely used, have open source servers and apps, end-to-end encryption (OMEMO), self-hostable and are low on ressources and federated / decentralized.

I use it with family and friends. Conversations and blabber.im on android and Gajim on Linux. There’s also apps for windows and Apple.

Curious if anyone here use it and why, why not?

EDIT: Doh. In these Lemmy times I forgot federated. Added.

  • leetnewb@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use it for OMEMO encrypted family messaging and image transfer (snikket). Very fast messaging, lightweight server, and the A/V works quite well. Biggest issue, imo, is the lack of a great iOS client - not a judgement on the developers, I think that’s just the reality of developing on iOS. But an iOS client that works as seamlessly as Conversations would go a long way to regaining lost traction.

    • Chobbes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I’ve been saying for years. Siskin is pretty good these days, but it’s still not perfect (push notifications with OMEMO have no content). It’s really hard to recommend XMPP to people when the iOS experience is kind of bad (with omemo, anyway).

      • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I cannot recommend Siskin, as those in my life that have tried it have always experienced random issues. I find Monal to be a better experience in every way, except for the lack of calling support with Conversations.

        • Chobbes@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Monal is okay. It chews up battery and recently did some heinous crimes with group chat notifications so I’ve switched to Siskin. Either way… Neither app is perfect. Xmpp is decent on iOS now, but still a little lacking.

  • agrammatic@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What I have to give to XMPP is that it’s one of the easiest federated services to self-host. Running Prosody is super simple.

    • Chobbes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Prosody is amazing and I’m still astounded by how easy it is to get XMPP up and running. That’s great stuff!

  • Senseibull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it should be incorporated into Lemmy as a chat function. Also been thinking if I could develop it, I have experience with XMPP from an application my employer creates.

    • GraceGH@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do we have to give every forum a chat function? I don’t want anyone and everyone to be able to dial me up to talk about my internet post history

  • itchy_lizard@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like XMPP and OTR is nice, but we need double-ratchet for secure communications and sync with multiple devices.

    • leetnewb@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Omemo is double ratchet and my messages sync to multiple devices. New device can’t read old messages sent before exchanging keys with the other clients.

  • fouc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s trivial to self host. I’m running a server on a small VPS for the family. Best part is they don’t even know they are running XMPP, just installed Conversations and that was it.

    • Chobbes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I switched to iOS from android a while ago, but conversations was an AMAZING app and I wish there was something even half as good on iOS. That said… isn’t it the case that conversations is a paid app on Google play, and only free on fdroid? It’s totally worth the $2 or whatever it was on Google play, but I feel like it’s a hard sell for normal people who are used to free chat apps? Did you have any problems with that, or has the situation changed since I last looked?

      • leetnewb@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is also Cheogram (conversations fork), which is actively developed/tweaked by the jmp.chat folks - very nice. Also Snikket (conversations fork) that is themed and tweaked to use with a snikket server, but it happily works with other servers.

        Another interesting tidbit. Chromebooks integrate the Android runtime to run play store apps. Windows 11 is also kinda/sorta shipping an Android runtime, but not by default. You can also spin up an Android runtime on Linux. I tested the snikket android app on Windows 11 and ChromeOS - works perfectly. So, I suspect all conversations forks can run across Android, Windows, ChromeOS, and Linux platforms - pretty neat. Doesn’t solve the iOS gap and getting the runtimes going could use polish on Windows and Linux. And nothing against the other desktop apps in development, but the ability to essentially run the Android app against most major environments makes me want to contribute to that code base (if I had any ability to develop for android, that is).

        • Chobbes@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yeah, another fun fact is that Snikket on iOS is a rebranding of Siskin. On iOS Siskin seems to be the best option right now with the one caveat that push notifications won’t contain the content of OMEMO messages (I think the plan is to design and implement an encrypted push XEP?). Conversations is probably the best xmpp application out there, so I’ve been tempted to run it on Linux via the Android runtime in the past. These days I’m pretty happy with Dino.

          I feel like we need something like converse.js on all platforms or something. Just something decent and consistent so you can recommend it to a friend on a different device and help them / understand their perspective, you know? I think converse.js has a desktop app via electron now, which seems like a start.

          • leetnewb@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The standalone converse app was problematic when I tried it last. Also, there was a summer of code attempt at bringing jingle a/v sessions to converse, but it was never completed and nobody seems to have picked it up.

            • Chobbes@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a bit of a shame. I don’t personally find jingle that important, but it’d be great if it worked… Also OMEMO on converse is sort of in a weird state I think. AFAIK it still depends on a JS libsignal library that’s deprecated.

      • fouc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes Conversations is still a paid app on Play Store. The F-Droid version also doesn’t support Google cloud notifications so some message notifications will go missing occasionally. For Android there’s also Quickly which is a Conversations fork and aTalk which works OK but reminds me of 90s Windows software. It’s still quite usable though. Honestly Conversations is totally worth the money if only for the amount of effort gone into modernising the platform which also a testament to its extensibility.

        • Chobbes@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, I totally agree that conversations is worth the $4 or whatever. I just have a hard time convincing friends to switch over to a new chat application to talk to only me when it’s not even free for them, you know? And if it’s a less technical person getting them on fdroid is a tricky proposition too. I don’t begrudge conversations for charging, but I do think it would be easier to get people on XMPP otherwise.

  • zorrothefox2001@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    IIRC Google Talk using XMPP and most major messengers having GTalk integration, they pretty much accidentally federated several messenger apps

  • Matija Šuklje@toot.si
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    @privsecfoss I would absolutely love to get back to #XMPP as my main (ideally only) IM, but in time some things made it hard to do so:

    - it’s extensible and not all clients support all modernly needed extensions - the #Jabber XEP solves this (on paper/standard level)
    - loads of spam - again, tackled by Jabber XEP bundle and clients that fully implement it
    - and ultimately, 90% of my contacts there never pop up anymore - network effect problem