• piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If you’re a fan of the idea, you’re either a nazi or really really ignorant/naive/misinformed.

    So I’ll assume the latter and try to briefly explain to you why it’s so bad: people bad, authoritarianism inevitable, results in ‘oops you’re not “human” because you lack/have X, you must die’

    Humanity, just like nature, thrives with diversity. Eugenics starts with “getting rid of nasty diseases” but it’s always 1 bad classification of “disease” away from genocide.

    • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ok then lets say you could prevent your son from have cancer in his teens or heart disease in his twenties or addictition in his forties or alzheimers or dementia or any other type of disease it’s not you conforming to society like changing looks or anything. But if done correctly tell me you would not want your son to get the best start from birth?

        • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Scientifically probably not. But lets say in the next 5 years we can pinpoint diseases that were terminal. Counting out the government or anyone else besides loved ones or at least just the parents?

          • Mesa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Would you trust your government to fairly and equitably decide who gets such treatments?

            The scientific, societal, and economic aspects of eugenics are inextricable.