Can’t imagine using my system without this.

  • asap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As someone new to Linux, what would be a few reasons that you prefer this to using the built-in GUI file browser?

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can’t believe no one mentioned this, but: remote access.

      I spend most of my day connected to machines via SSH and yazi offers a great UX with file previews and all. Using kitty I even get image previews in the terminal.

      • rcbrk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        remote access

        To be fair, X11 forwarding is a straightforward thing, bearing in mind any security/performance/administrative restrictions which may apply to your situation.

        Alternatively, SSHFS can be used to mount a remote directory locally.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I’ve used plenty of sshfs a few years ago, but x11 forwarding is a compromise. The latency makes it painful to work with for more than a few minutes.

          • rcbrk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, X11 forwarding is only fine on a campus wide network, maybe city-wide at most, if the wan is fast enough.

            Sshfs would also be painful for operations processing a lot of data (grepping gigs of log files or even creating thumbnails of images to browse).

        • ManTaboo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          They are two different things. Yazi is a file manager and Kitty is a terminal emulator.

          • typhoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ok, Dolphin would be the comparative here from KDE Qt but, since is made for GTK probably Nautilus is the one to be compared.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can navigate without using my mouse. It’s faster for me. You can create tabs, copy and paste files, extract compressed files, run commands, and so much more without lofting my hand. My favorite feature is the ability to preview files without even opening them. I’m relatively new to linux too.

    • sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Download 5 seasons of some show from multiple sources or some artist’s entire discography, and want to normalize all the file names? It is way easier in the terminal.

      I’ll check this out, but I use https://github.com/stevearc/oil.nvim for such tasks as I have nvim’s full suite of editor commands to rename all the files way faster than I could in a GUI. I’m sure there are GUI apps to perform a similar task, but I already know how to use nvim.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago
      • Terminal file manager are useful on a server over ssh.
      • ripgrep and fd support is better than any GUI file manager find and replace.
      • Some people like using vim keybindings
      • The three panel view is really useful. On the left is the parent folder, the middle the current and on the right a preview, e.g. the selected folder or the contents of a picture or a text file. It’s faster to navigate and pop back into the shell.
    • ninjaturtle@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can probably do some more advance tasks via CLI. Also usually lists information faster. But honestly you will be overall fine with GUI a majority of the time.

      Some people just like being in the terminal.

    • _hovi_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Other people have given great reasons, but I will also mention that as someone who lives inside the terminal it’s often faster and easier to open it right there rather than getting a GUI one going. I do still use one for things that are easier to do with a graphical file manager though, no problem having both

    • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wouldn’t bother unless you find yourself doing more through the terminal than through GUIs.

      I don’t have a built-in file browser (not using a DE, just i3 window manager), so I use ranger and pure GNU coreutils commands mostly but I still find myself missing the drag-and-drop features that FreeDesktop integration provides for stuff like nautilus.

    • Joël de Bruijn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m fairly new to Linux also, Debian with Gnome.

      I need CLI filemanager when doing something outside home directory etc.

      For example fix a desktop shortcut and you can’t start Nautilus "as an administrator " afaik. Or it won’t ask for root password.