• MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to assume you misspoke there, but the notion of fediverse instances “deplatforming” Meta is… quite the notion.

    Defederating from Meta is not so much “deplatforming” them, as refusing to be in their platform.

    • Thalestr@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe not the right word to use, but the fediverse coming together in agreement to not federate with “Threads” takes away a lot of the benefit Meta gets from creating a federated service in the first place. It’s basically pulling the rug out from under Meta before they’ve even taken a first step on it. It’s a smart move and I support it 100%

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No it doesn’t, because the only benefit Meta gets from creating a federated service is to have the same back of the box feature as BlueSky.

        Like, there is literally no other advantage for them. The paranoid assumption that this is a ploy to remove competition is ludicrous. Nothing about ActivityPub competes in any meaningful way with Meta. If I had to bet, the entire concept is fully a PR move.